Skip to content
MENU
INCUMBENT RUNNING

Ward 3

Northeast London: Fanshawe College area · Kilally corridor · Stoney Creek · north of Fanshawe Park Road

WARD 3 DEBATE · RECORDING
Watch the Ward 3 debate on YouTube →
Held Thursday, October 1, 2026 at Fanshawe College - Forwell Hall. Recorded by Rogers TV London.
Urban League of London ↗Organized by a third party, not London Decides. Dates and locations can change. Every meeting and debate →
1234567891011121314NOT YOURS? ↗
THE SHORT VERSION

Your ward at a glance

Six candidates: first-term incumbent Peter Cuddy faces five challengers. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. The race is about growth in the northeast, with the Kilally corridor now split with Ward 4 by the new boundary and what Fanshawe College's enrolment shock means for the neighbourhoods around campus. The ward's boundaries were redrawn for this election: areas north of Fanshawe Park Road join Ward 3, while most of the Huron Heights core moves to Ward 4.

Two candidates carry a prior election record. Peter Cuddy, the incumbent, was elected Ward 3 councillor in 2022 with 1,433 votes (36.17%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results. Leroy Osbourne, the sitting TVDSB trustee for Wards 2-6, was elected in 2022 with 5,142 votes (19.53%), the second of two seats, per the City's certified results.

The rest of the field, in alphabetical order: Ben Durham, Harkirat Kaur, Riya Philip, and Zak Rahim.

THE FIELD

Who's running

Listed alphabetically. Identical treatment for every candidate. That's the deal.

QUESTIONNAIRE1 of 6 in this ward have answered

Peter Cuddy

Incumbent Ward 3 councillor

Elected Ward 3 councillor in 2022: 1,433 votes (36.17%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results.

Record · 2022–2026 →

LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIRENo response yet. Sent September 3.

Sent out September 3, 2026. Answers are posted here word for word when they arrive. Anything back within a week goes up September 10.

Leroy Osbourne

Incumbent TVDSB trustee (Wards 2–6)

Elected Thames Valley trustee for Wards 2-6 in 2022: 5,142 votes (19.53%), the second of two seats, per the City's certified results.

LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIREReceived September 27

Received September 27, 2026 · updated September 27, 2026

Q1 — The one thingFULL QUESTION ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“I would like to see that we truly made significant strides in homelessness. My proposal to setup a modern day psychiatric hospital space aka a mental health village, on light commercial zoned land on the outskirts, with micro shelters, a HART hub and intensive housing in one space to truly start giving the unhoused an authentic and comprehensive plan to find purpose and real help to get back on their feet again. The downtown plan for the first five years would be what I would give up.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFULL QUESTION ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“I have performed that dynamic in different spaces from being part of a workplace negotiation team, a school board trustee and now at the doors of voters who have a competing ward candidate sign on their lawn. For job contract negotiations. We ask for the moon based on what we think could be achievable. Knowing beforehand, what are non-negotiable items, to items that are open to compromise, to making asks that could be throwaways. The opposing party has three negotiators; I was tasked with research for our side. I also went to the negotiations to observe and take note of the opposing team dynamics. Who was the pragmatic, who could be the softie, who was the hardliner and what their MO around that. We tended to need to bring around the CFO and be mindful of the total compensation package to see what could be decreased in the lower-priority pile to ensure we got the high-priority and possibly more expensive items that the membership would want. For the 'bring around' sometimes that would require letting go of outdated costly entitlements to get benefits that would help 90% of the membership. It was typically trying to strive for a win-win and in other cases, holding the line on issues of principle or matters that would create morality issues or trust issues if the compromise was allowed to leave the negotiation room.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFULL QUESTION ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“Aspects of affordability. There are variables or a spectrum of concerns in that area that is not municipal. From gas prices, to interest rates, to food costs. Higher level of government hold the keys and responsibility for some of the things I have mentioned. What I would move would be lessening the burden on Londoners through having the city invest in better financial products that large pension plans participate in now that municipalities can now. Look at ways for the City to have income-producing assets. Lobby the provincial to reimburse the City on initiatives that decrease hospital says and EMS calls. I would look at way that are within the control of the city to change how the City does busy and put less burden on Londoners via properties taxes, to subsidizing more services from these new income sources to bring relief.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFULL QUESTION ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“Bringing about a modern-day psychiatric hospital model which provides stabilization communities for the homeless, will have a HART Hub and an intensive housing building all on one site. I am torn between allocating resources to address this and not being able to purse affordable first time homeownership. My strongest argument against my position, is we do not know if the provincial government will one day stop providing financial support for HART hubs in turn creating a tremendous financial burden on the city.”
Q5 — The receiptFULL QUESTION ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“As TVDSB Trustee, I was the lead policy writer for the School Council Policy and procedure. I expanded and articulated the purview of school councils to ensure they knew their power, authority and involvement at the school level and that they were given orientation on important aspects like reporting bullying in their school, understanding the complaint process, understanding the strategic plan and knowing how to make recommendations to the Board of Trustees just to name a few. I also orchestrated what the principal was now required to consult with school councils about as per the school council procedures. My work and engagement in this instance was to ensure that parents were empowered to get involved in their child's school and be able to have a path to their elected official at the Board level. School Councils Policy | Thames Valley District School Board https://www.tvdsb.ca/media-manager/media-pages/policies-and-procedures/school-councils-procedure/”
LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIRENo response yet. Sent September 3.

Sent out September 3, 2026. Answers are posted here word for word when they arrive. Anything back within a week goes up September 10.

No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · Answers published word for word · How we research →

WHAT'S AT STAKE

What Ward 3 is wrestling with

Honestly told: the situation, the numbers, and what to ask the people who want your vote.

□ SHARED: CITY + FEDS

Fanshawe College is Ward 3's file now

Under the boundaries council approved in December 2024, Fanshawe College's main campus sits in Ward 3, per the City's official boundary data. The college is in a documented enrolment shock: it projected roughly 5,000 fewer international students for 2025-26 under the federal permit cap, suspended future intakes for 40 programs while cutting staffing by about 35%, and is leaving its south London campus. The permit caps are federal and college funding is provincial, so a councillor can't fix Fanshawe's budget. What the city does control is the neighbourhoods around campus: rental licensing under by-law CP-19, property-standards enforcement, and transit service to the campus.

The honest numbers ▾

About 5,000 fewer international students projected for 2025-26; future intakes suspended for 40 programs; staffing cut by roughly 35% (about 400 full-time positions). CBC London (program cuts) ↗

Put them on the record

Fanshawe's enrolment drop is driven from Ottawa and Queen's Park. What would you actually do with the city's own levers, rental licensing, property standards, transit, for the neighbourhoods around campus?

■ CITY DECIDES

The Kilally corridor, now split down the middle

Ward 3's best-known growth fights sit right on its new edge. The three-tower proposal at 1470-1474 Highbury Avenue North (402 units, rejected by the Planning and Environment Committee in 2025 after staff cited groundwater and setback concerns) is on the Ward 4 side of the 2026 boundary, per the City's official boundary data, and as of August 2, 2026 we could not confirm whether the refusal was appealed. The Kilally Infrastructure Project rebuilding the road from Webster Street to Clarke Road runs through both wards: construction is staged into 2028, and the JW Carson Bridge closure on Clarke Road (July 13 to August 14, 2026) is part of the same growth work. Whoever wins Ward 3 and Ward 4 will inherit this corridor together.

The honest numbers ▾

Construction is planned in stages: Webster-Sandford (2026), Sandford-Clarke (2027), surface work and cleanup (2028). City of London (Get Involved) ↗

Put them on the record

Which specific sites on the ward's stretch of the Kilally corridor should take high-density growth, and how would you work with the Ward 4 councillor on the shared road work?

■ CITY DECIDES

Which ward are you in now?

Some residents will vote in a different ward than in 2022: the final boundary option moves the Ward 3/Ward 4 line and adds territory north of Fanshawe Park Road to Ward 3. Some current Ward 3 files, including Huron Heights-specific ones, may shift to the new Ward 4 councillor instead. Confirm your new ward on the city's interactive map rather than assuming continuity.

The honest numbers ▾

The 2025 population estimate for the then-current Ward 3 was 27,299, the smallest ward population cited in the boundary review's example table.

Put them on the record

Which neighbourhoods that are new to Ward 3 will you visit first, and when?

■ CITY DECIDES

What sidewalk money reaches Ward 3?

London's Connectivity Plan and the Renew London capital program include sidewalk, cycling, and road work relevant to the ward's growth areas. We couldn't confirm specific Ward 3 line items in this research pass.

The honest numbers ▾

Roughly $385 million citywide in 2026; no Ward 3-specific project list confirmed.

Put them on the record

Which sidewalk and cycling connections inside the new Ward 3 would you push to fund first?

YOU DON’T HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL OCTOBER

Change can start now, at any point

The ballot is one tool, not the only one. Between elections, the people who show up are the ones who get heard, and you can start today, not next fall.

  • Email or call your councillor. Every office lists a phone number and address, and a single resident's message still lands. City of London ↗
  • Speak at a committee. Any resident can register as a delegation and take five minutes to address a Standing Committee on an item that's on its agenda. City of London ↗
  • Read the record. Agendas, staff reports, and every recorded vote are posted publicly on the city's meeting portal. City meetings ↗

None of it waits four years. The people already in the room are the ones who asked to be.

DON'T STOP AT ONE RACE

Also on your ballot

Before you go

The rest is showing up

You’ve read the ward. Ward races here can come down to a few hundred ballots, sometimes fewer. In a race that close, your vote is one of the ones that decides it. You don’t need to know everything. You just need to show up, informed.

BEFORE OCT 26

How to vote in Ward 3

ADVANCE
Oct 1
ADVANCE
Oct 3
ADVANCE
Oct 5–10
ELECTION DAY
Oct 26 · 10 am – 8 pm

You’ll need ID with your name and address. Full voting guide: where, what to bring, who can vote →

WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM YET ▾
  • August 8, 2026: Stoney Creek confirmed as Ward 3 territory (99.8% of the planning district) when checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer (Open Data, Community MapServer layer 18) sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (the same Open Data file the site’s ward maps are built from); it was previously mislisted on the Ward 5 page. The region line now names it.
  • The new Ward 3 street-level boundary is not confirmed from a primary map; which named neighbourhoods fall in new Ward 3 versus new Ward 4 should be checked against the city's interactive ward map before relying on boundary claims.
  • Recreation and community-facility capacity in growth-area neighbourhoods (e.g., Stoney Creek) was flagged as a plausible pressure point but not confirmed as an active council file, so it is not listed as a ward issue here.
  • Several CBC and CTV articles could not be fetched directly; facts drawn from them come from search-engine snippets and secondary summaries.
  • OPEN, checked August 2, 2026: whether the developer appealed the September 2025 committee refusal of the 1470–1474 Highbury Avenue North towers (application OZ-9508) to the Ontario Land Tribunal could not be confirmed. A forum thread title suggests an appeal was filed, but the thread was inaccessible and no primary tribunal record was located, so no appeal is asserted here. Recommended follow-up: search the Ontario Land Tribunal case-status portal at olt.gov.on.ca/case-status for OZ-9508.
  • The JW Carson Bridge closure on Clarke Road was scheduled to end August 14, 2026. Whether it reopened on that date was not confirmed in this pass.
  • A few honest-numbers items on this page (boundary/ward-line details, sidewalk funding) don't yet link to a primary source; we're still tracking those down.