Skip to content
MENU
OPEN SEAT

Ward 7

Northwest London: Hyde Park · Fox Hollow · Sunningdale Road corridor · part of Medway

WARD 7 DEBATE · RECORDING
Watch the Ward 7 debate on YouTube →
Held Thursday, October 1, 2026 at Sir Frederick Banting Secondary School. Recorded by Rogers TV London.
Urban League of London ↗Organized by a third party, not London Decides. Dates and locations can change. Every meeting and debate →
1234567891011121314NOT YOURS? ↗
THE SHORT VERSION

Your ward at a glance

Ward 7 is an open seat: the boundary redraw moved councillor Corrine Rahman's home into the new Ward 5, where she's running instead. Eight candidates remain after one withdrawal. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. With nearly 50,000 residents it is London's largest ward by population, and the race is about growth in the fast-building northwest (the old ward's size drove the boundary review) and whether roads, sewers, buses, and sidewalks can keep up.

None of the eight candidates here carries a verified prior election record. In alphabetical order: Kamrul Ahsan, German Gutierrez, Sam Hajar, Waseem Kazzah, Bensy Mathew, Dan Meinen, Djuma Moïse Sharifu, and Jonathan Sher.

THE FIELD

Who's running

Listed alphabetically. Identical treatment for every candidate. That's the deal.

QUESTIONNAIRE4 of 8 in this ward have answered
LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIREReceived October 7

Received October 7, 2026

Q1 — The one thingFULL QUESTION ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“By the end of the next term, I want London to stop approving growth and then trying to catch up with the infrastructure afterward. In 2030, a resident in a new neighbourhood should be able to point to working transit, sidewalks, roads, parks and other basic services and say: these were planned and delivered alongside the homes. I would be willing to give up lower-priority projects and politically attractive spending to do that. I would also be willing to vote against or delay growth where the infrastructure needed to support it is not properly funded. Growth is important, but growth without planning leaves the bill with existing residents.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFULL QUESTION ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“When I was involved in student politics at BUET, I was part of a group pushing for critical repairs to our mechanical engineering labs. The university administration had drafted a budget report prioritizing a centralized printing facility instead. The senior faculty and staff flatly refused to alter their plans. To bring them around, I changed my strategy. I dropped our secondary request for extended cafeteria meal hours entirely to respect their strict budget ceiling. Then, instead of arguing for student convenience, I used maintenance data to prove that the broken lab machinery was an immediate physical safety hazard. By sacrificing the meal program and reframing the lab repairs as a critical safety necessity, I secured the agreement needed from the decision-makers to get the repairs approved.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFULL QUESTION ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“People will ask City Hall to fix problems with mental-health and addiction treatment that the City does not control. I would tell them honestly that London cannot create provincial health-care services on its own. The province and the health system have that responsibility. That does not mean doing nothing. I would push our local MPPs and the provincial government for the services London needs, bring local evidence to those discussions, work with hospitals and community organizations, and use the City's responsibilities around housing and homelessness to support people where we can. I would rather tell someone the truth about who has the power to act than promise something Council cannot deliver.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFULL QUESTION ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“The issue I most want to be known for is getting growth and infrastructure to keep pace with each other. Where I feel torn is housing. If we make the process too restrictive or insist that every piece of infrastructure be finished first, we can slow housing construction and make homes even more expensive. The strongest argument against my position is that cities also have to grow. New development brings jobs, tax revenue and new housing, and waiting for perfect infrastructure can mean waiting forever. My answer is: better sequencing. Where major growth is approved, there should be a clear plan for the roads, transit and services it depends on, with the funding and timelines made public.”
Q5 — The receiptFULL QUESTION ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“Before this campaign, I was already involved in community service in London through the Hyde Park & District Lions Club and the Rotary Club of London Hyde Park. I have also supported youth sports and other community initiatives. That experience matters to me because community work is not about making promises; it is about showing up, working with other people and getting practical things done. That is the same approach I would bring to Council. My background and community involvement are described here: https://afmkamrulahsan.ca/”
LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIREReceived September 11

Received September 11, 2026

Q1 — The one thingFULL QUESTION ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“The one thing I most want to see changed by the end of my council term is a London where homelessness and the deterioration of our public spaces are no longer accepted as normal. For Ward 7, I want to see the widening of Wonderland Road completed, along with a new community centre that includes an indoor pool, YMCA, resource centre, and library. By 2030, residents should be able to walk through downtown, their neighbourhoods, and local parks and see a noticeable improvement. For Ward 7 residents, that means better roads, stronger infrastructure to keep pace with the ward’s rapid growth, and a community centre that supports families while keeping pace with the ward’s rapid growth.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFULL QUESTION ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“In my role as a Business and Zoning Coordinator with the City of London, I often need to reach an agreement with managers when interpreting and applying different by-laws and legislation. In one instance, I was working to approve an application, but my managers did not agree with my proposed approach. After some back and forth, rather than continuing to argue my position, I met with them to better understand where their concerns were coming from. Based on that discussion, I adjusted my approach. Instead of insisting that every detail be addressed in the same way, I identified the areas where consistency was actually necessary to achieve compliance and maintain safety, accountability, and customer service standards. This allowed us to find an approach that addressed management’s concerns while still meeting the requirements of the application.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFULL QUESTION ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“One thing I expect residents will ask me about is access to family doctors and health care. I would be straightforward with them: City Council does not run Ontario’s healthcare system and that that area is the responsibility of the Province of Ontario. As a councillor, I would push the province for our fair share of healthcare resources, work with local health-care providers and physician recruitment efforts and look at what the City can do within its own authority. My answer to residents would be: Council cannot make that decision, but I can make sure the people who can make it are hearing from us and I can use every tool the City does have to help move it forward.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFULL QUESTION ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“The issue I most want to be known for is investing in the infrastructure, improving our roads, strengthening public transit so people can move around the city more efficiently, and investing in community spaces, including the development of a new community centre that gives residents access to recreation, programming, services, and a place to come together. Where I feel torn is between the urgency of these investments and the financial reality of delivering them. The strongest argument against my position is funding. My approach would be to aggressively pursue funding from every available source. I would lobby the municipal, provincial, and federal governments for greater infrastructure investment while also exploring responsible opportunities for private investment and partnerships, including ways for London residents and the local business community to invest in the future of their city.”
Q5 — The receiptFULL QUESTION ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“Before this campaign, I applied to legalize a third unit in one of my residential rental properties in London. The unit is 700 sqf, has existed since 1972, and the City had been aware of its existence, but the previous owner had never formally legalize it. No new construction was required, yet the process still required a lengthy and expensive rezoning application. Rather than simply going through the process, I appeared before London’s Planning and Environment Committee and argued that the City needed a simpler pathway for situations like this. My position was if an existing unit can meet building, and fire requirements without major construction, we should be making it easier not harder to bring those units into compliance. The City of London has since moved in that direction, including expanded permissions for Additional Residential Units and a streamlined approval process for certain minor zoning amendments.”
LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIREReceived September 16

Received September 16, 2026

Q1 — The one thingFULL QUESTION ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“By 2030, I want London’s infrastructure and services to keep pace with growth. Residents should see safer roads, reliable transit, and new housing supported by essential services. I would defer lower-priority projects and reduce unnecessary consulting costs to fund these priorities.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFULL QUESTION ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“As president of Huron’s WUSC committee, I helped secure more support for refugee students. We brought students and administrators together by proposing shared funding: students would contribute if Huron matched it. I gave up asking the institution to carry the full cost, and the compromise expanded scholarships.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFULL QUESTION ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“Residents may ask for more family doctors, but healthcare is primarily a provincial responsibility. I would be honest about that while advocating to the province, working with healthcare partners, identifying space for clinics, and removing municipal barriers.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFULL QUESTION ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“I want to be known for financial accountability and clear public reporting (for example, Madrid - City of Madrid Open Budgets) . The tension is balancing affordable taxes with needed services. The strongest argument against my position is that excessive restraint can delay investments and cost more later. Responsible budgeting must protect essential services while eliminating spending that does not deliver results.”
Q5 — The receiptFULL QUESTION ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“Before this campaign, I helped lead a Huron University initiative that increased support and scholarships for refugee students. We built agreement between students and the institution around shared funding. It shows how I work: listen, build coalitions, and turn advocacy into measurable results.”

Bensy Mathew

LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIRENo response yet. Sent September 3.

Sent out September 3, 2026. Answers are posted here word for word when they arrive. Anything back within a week goes up September 10.

Dan Meinen

LONDON DECIDES QUESTIONNAIREReceived September 25

Received September 25, 2026

Q1 — The one thingFULL QUESTION ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“I want London to stop governing by reaction. Wonderland Road shows the problem. London shelved its ring road decades ago, so traffic that should go around the city goes through it. Council is revisiting a six-lane widening that staff estimated would save about two minutes between Fanshawe and Southdale, at roughly $400 million. That's a reaction, not a plan. A ring road, paired with better transit, is. Transit is the same. We're investing $454 million in bus rapid transit, but neither line reaches the northwest. What good is a fast bus if you can't get on it? On homelessness, we fund crisis response over keeping people housed. By 2030, you'll see a ring road with a route study and funding plan, transit in new neighbourhoods before families arrive, and quarterly public results on homelessness. Proactive as opposed to reactive.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFULL QUESTION ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“As a City of London building inspector, I make calls that contractors, builders and developers disagree with, sometimes calls that cost them upwards of $100,000 to fix. I have the authority to order the work, but forcing it creates friction, delays and a worse outcome for the community. I bring people around instead. I start by explaining the reason behind the rule, not just the code requirement. Then I change my ask: rather than insisting on a specific fix, I tell them what the code needs to achieve and let their engineer or designer propose how to get there. Where it's safe, I let work continue elsewhere on site while the issue is resolved. What I give up is control over the method. What I don't give up is safety. Results, not effort, are what matter, on a job site and at the council table.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFULL QUESTION ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“At the door, people talk about homelessness: cleaning up our streets and our downtown core. I tell them plainly that much of the answer isn't council's to decide. Mental health and addictions care are healthcare, funded and run by the province, not the city. What council can do is make London's case to Queen's Park, loudly. We're spending $454 million on bus rapid transit, with about $176 million from the province and Ottawa, while the core issue goes unsolved. It's like bringing a new couch into a burning house. Our house is on fire, downtown is uninvestable, and we're decorating. With London's unemployment rate hitting 9.1% this spring, the highest in Canada, homelessness isn't just a social issue. It's pushing our economy in the wrong direction. We need to address the actual issues, not the symptoms of the issues.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFULL QUESTION ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“I want to be known as a common-sense councillor: someone who backs policies that help the whole city and make London more liveable for everyone, including the generations after us. Where I feel torn is on where supportive housing and hubs should go. I lived through the proposal to turn the Lighthouse Inn and Black Pearl on Fanshawe Park Road into a homeless hub. Many neighbours learned about it days before the vote. People need help, and it has to go somewhere. But when a neighbourhood is left out of the decision, nobody wins. The strongest argument against me is that "common sense" is what every candidate claims, and it can mean whatever the speaker wants. Voters deserve more than a slogan. That's why my platform has clear proposals, not just slogans.”
Q5 — The receiptFULL QUESTION ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“I served in the Canadian Armed Forces, including a deployment to Afghanistan with the infantry. My decorations include the Sacrifice Medal, awarded for being wounded in combat, as well as the General Campaign Star (South-West Asia) and a Commander-in-Chief Unit Commendation. Service taught me to put my country's values ahead of myself: duty, accountability, and looking after the people beside you. After the military, I came home to London and kept serving, first in the trades and now as a City of London building inspector, making sure the buildings Londoners live and work in are safe. That's how I'd do this job: mission first, results over effort, and accountable to the people I serve. Details: danmeinen.ca/about”

No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · Answers published word for word · How we research →

WHAT'S AT STAKE

What Ward 7 is wrestling with

Honestly told: the situation, the numbers, and what to ask the people who want your vote.

■ CITY DECIDES

Growth is beating the roads and sewers

Roads, water and sewer capacity, and community facilities are recurring worries in fast-growth suburban wards, and Ward 7's northwest neighbourhoods have been among London's fastest-growing for years, the reason the old ward grew big enough to trigger a citywide boundary review. City figures cited in CBC's coverage of that review had the old Ward 7 carrying roughly 22,000 more residents than Ward 2. CBC News returned to the ward on July 29, 2026 and reported that infrastructure lagging behind the growth is what the leading candidates keep coming back to. No city report itemizing this ward's own project backlog has been located.

The honest numbers ▾

Ward 7 has nearly 50,000 residents, the highest of London's 14 wards. CBC News, July 29, 2026 ↗

Put them on the record

Which northwest infrastructure gap would you fund first: roads, sewers, or community facilities?

■ CITY DECIDES

Traffic is getting worse

Congestion is a consistent theme in northwest London's growth areas, and Wonderland Road is where it concentrates, at its worst near Sarnia Road. Council rejected a study on widening Wonderland in 2021 and restarted it in the spring of 2025, so the question is back on the table without an answer yet. Widening Sunningdale Road from two lanes to four has been discussed since the 1950s and is finally under construction in 2026.

The honest numbers ▾

Wonderland Road carries about 48,000 vehicles a day, per CBC News, July 29, 2026, which also reports the 2021 rejection and the spring 2025 restart of the widening study. CBC News, July 29, 2026 ↗

Put them on the record

Name one funded step you'd take on congestion in the Hyde Park and Sunningdale corridors.

■ CITY DECIDES

Three bus routes for the whole ward

For the most populous ward in the city, transit coverage is thin. London Transit runs three routes in Ward 7, and only one of them goes north of Fanshawe Park Road, which leaves much of the newer northwest a drive-or-nothing area.

The honest numbers ▾

Three London Transit routes serve Ward 7; one extends north of Fanshawe Park Road, per CBC News, July 29, 2026. CBC News, July 29, 2026 ↗

Put them on the record

What is your specific plan for bus service north of Fanshawe Park Road, and in which term does it happen?

■ CITY DECIDES

The sidewalk that just stops

On Hyde Park Road just north of Fanshawe Park Road the sidewalk runs out, so people on foot cut through a Rona parking lot to get past the gap. CBC News used it on July 29, 2026 as the small, concrete version of the ward's larger complaint: the basics have not caught up to the building.

The honest numbers ▾

A Ward 7 candidate framed the gap to CBC as a city with a $1.4-billion budget unable to find $50,000 for a sidewalk. Both figures are that candidate's, as reported by CBC News on July 29, 2026, and were not checked against city budget or cost documents here. CBC News, July 29, 2026 ↗

Put them on the record

Name the sidewalk or crossing gap in Ward 7 you would fix first, and what you think it costs.

□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE

Keeping new homes affordable

Housing and cost of living rank among Londoners' top concerns for 2026 in a London-wide CBC reader survey, alongside homelessness and drug use, context, though not Ward 7-specific polling. Ward 7 campaign messaging talks directly about balancing continued suburban building against "responsible development."

The honest numbers ▾

The CBC reader survey drew 330+ respondents and was non-scientific; results were citywide, not broken out for Ward 7. CBC News ↗

Put them on the record

Should new northwest subdivisions pay more of their own servicing costs, even if that raises new-home prices?

□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE

The big three: homelessness, safety, roads

Homelessness, open drug use, and public safety register as top-tier concerns citywide in the CBC reader survey. The most visible impact is concentrated downtown, but candidates in outer wards like Ward 7 may still hear these at the door.

Put them on the record

What would you actually vote for on homelessness and downtown safety as a suburban ward's councillor?

YOU DON’T HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL OCTOBER

Change can start now, at any point

The ballot is one tool, not the only one. Between elections, the people who show up are the ones who get heard, and you can start today, not next fall.

  • Email or call your councillor. Every office lists a phone number and address, and a single resident's message still lands. City of London ↗
  • Speak at a committee. Any resident can register as a delegation and take five minutes to address a Standing Committee on an item that's on its agenda. City of London ↗
  • Read the record. Agendas, staff reports, and every recorded vote are posted publicly on the city's meeting portal. City meetings ↗

None of it waits four years. The people already in the room are the ones who asked to be.

DON'T STOP AT ONE RACE

Also on your ballot

Before you go

The rest is showing up

You’ve read the ward. Ward races here can come down to a few hundred ballots, sometimes fewer. In a race that close, your vote is one of the ones that decides it. You don’t need to know everything. You just need to show up, informed.

BEFORE OCT 26

How to vote in Ward 7

ADVANCE
Oct 1
ADVANCE
Oct 3
ADVANCE
Oct 5–10
ELECTION DAY
Oct 26 · 10 am – 8 pm

You’ll need ID with your name and address. Full voting guide: where, what to bring, who can vote →

WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM YET ▾
  • August 8, 2026 region audit: “Medway” qualified — the district is 55% Ward 6, 38% Ward 7 (checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (scripts/check-ward-regions.mjs)).
  • August 8, 2026: the official Sunningdale planning district lies ~100% in Ward 5 (checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer (Open Data, Community MapServer layer 18) sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (the same Open Data file the site’s ward maps are built from)). This page’s references are to the Sunningdale Road corridor and the subdivisions along it in the ward’s north, so the region line now says “Sunningdale Road corridor” to avoid claiming the district itself.
  • New Ward 7 boundary detail could not be extracted from an authoritative primary source in this pass; the assumption that it remains anchored on Hyde Park/Fox Hollow/Sunningdale/Medway should be verified against the City's interactive ArcGIS ward map or the Ward Boundary Review final report before relying on it.
  • RESOLVED August 2, 2026: a population figure for the new Ward 7 is confirmed. CBC News (July 29, 2026) reports nearly 50,000 residents, the highest of London's 14 wards, which now leads the growth issue card and the glance. The earlier old-ward comparison (~22,000 more residents than old Ward 2, from CBC's boundary-review coverage) is kept as context in that card but is superseded for the new ward.
  • Whether Ward 7's lines include any of the later amendment-round tweaks (which touched Wards 1, 4, 11, and 13) is inferred, not confirmed against the City's official record.
  • CBC.ca articles returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch in the July 2 pass; on July 3, 2026 both CBC articles cited on this page were fetched in full and the quoted figures (old Ward 7 ~22,000 residents more than Ward 2; 330+-response non-scientific survey) were verified against the article text.
  • RESOLVED August 2, 2026 (transit half): CBC News (July 29, 2026) confirms thin transit as an active Ward 7 flashpoint, with three London Transit routes in the ward and only one going north of Fanshawe Park Road; it now has its own issue card. Recreation and community-facility capacity is still unconfirmed and stays flagged rather than asserted.
  • RESOLVED August 2, 2026: Ward 7-specific reporting now exists. CBC News, "In London's fast-growing Ward 7, infrastructure lags top candidates' concerns" (July 29, 2026), itemizes the ward's infrastructure pressure points and is the source for the population, Wonderland traffic, bus-route, and Hyde Park sidewalk numbers on this page. It is news reporting, not a city document: no city report itemizing Ward 7's project backlog has been located.
  • Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the list on August 24.
  • The $1.4-billion city budget and $50,000 sidewalk figures on the sidewalk card are a candidate's framing as reported by CBC, not city documents. Neither was checked against the 2026 budget or an engineering cost estimate, and the candidate is left unnamed there because issue cards on this site are shared ground rather than campaign space.
  • The Wonderland Road widening study (rejected by council in 2021, restarted spring 2025) is sourced to CBC's July 29, 2026 reporting; the underlying council decisions were not pulled from the minutes, and no reporting date or completion target for the restarted study was located.
  • The claim that widening Sunningdale Road has been discussed since the 1950s comes from CBC's July 29, 2026 reporting and was not traced to a primary planning document.