This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 10 today: your councillor and the record →
Ward 10 is a five-candidate race. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. The live fight is Westmount, where Farhi Holdings bought the mall in 2025 and renamed it Westmount Commons: city staff recommended refusing a plan to more than double the office space allowed there, arguing it would undermine downtown as London's main office destination, and committee put the plan on hold rather than deciding it. Council also revived the six-lane Wonderland Road widening study in April 2025, and on August 11 the planning committee cleared the first hurdle for a 5,000-unit subdivision where Bostwick, Wharncliffe and Wonderland converge. New boundary lines weren't confirmed in this research.
One candidate carries a prior election record. Paul Van Meerbergen, the incumbent, was elected Ward 10 councillor in 2022 with 2,400 votes (41.93%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results.
The rest of the field, in alphabetical order: Juman Al-Jumaili, Steven Edwards, Alexander Moore, and Lois Margaret Ward.
Who ran
Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.
QUESTIONNAIRE2 of 5 in this ward have answered
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
JAJuman Al-Jumaili
SESteven Edwards
PMPaul Van MeerbergenIncumbent Ward 10 councillor
AMAlexander Moore
LWLois Margaret Ward
Scroll sideways to compare all 5 candidates →
1 of 5
Who they are
Proud Londoner with more than six years of work with vulnerable residents and a master's in public administration from Western. Running on public consultation, fiscal responsibility, safe infrastructure and parks.
Business owner and former security operations manager running a zero-budget campaign. Running on financial transparency and responsibility, voicing Ward 10's concerns at City Hall and taking part in city decisions.
Ward 10 councillor since 2018, in a fifth term overall, seeking re-election. Recently retired advanced-manufacturing manager in the auto industry. Running on traffic, crime and homelessness.
Sales manager and small-business owner who has coached martial arts for over 20 years. Running on housing, homelessness and addiction, limiting high-rise infill and holding tax increases to inflation.
Registered massage therapist and former Fanshawe interior design instructor who worked ten years for the Province of Nova Scotia. Running on affordable housing, better transit and protecting green spaces.
Slightly disagrees with using all means to meet affordable housing targets, saying record home building has not stopped homelessness from doubling. Wants other solutions and preventative measures explored.
Says no single fix works and governments must work together. Wants police and outreach helping businesses feel safe and unhoused people find homes, and empty downtown buildings reused for housing.
Wants a review of whether housing hubs and temporary housing address underlying issues, and how they affect neighbourhoods. Says the cost is massive and the province must take more responsibility.
Would start with compassion, not stigma. Says too few developments serve lower incomes and some become luxury condos once approved. Wants co-op and rent-geared-to-income units so nobody sleeps outside.
Says too little housing is affordable to low and moderate incomes. Would use incentives and hold developments to affordable-housing thresholds. Says truly affordable housing lowers the risk of low earners sliding into homelessness.
What would they do about roads, traffic and transit?
Prefers better transit to widening main roads, saying it could cut traffic, ease residents' transport costs and help the environment. Wants safe, well-maintained roads and sidewalks, planned for growth.
Says widening Wonderland is not the answer. Wants more transit and other traffic fixes tried first, before affecting the environment, businesses and homes. Wants transit overhauled to match the population.
Wants Wonderland, Southdale and Bostwick widened. Says road maintenance and traffic safety must stay priorities, including investing in existing roads and helping people cross and travel safely. Opposes bus rapid transit spending, not London Transit itself.
Would ask staff about timing and impact before deciding on six lanes for Wonderland. Says transit will matter more as London grows, and roads and transit must handle the volume.
Prefers improving transit to widening Wonderland, saying the climate emergency still stands. Wants buses that are more frequent, reliable, safe and cover more of the city, plus safer pedestrian crossings.
What would they do on addiction and mental health?
Says parks and community spaces support physical and mental well-being, and wants them protected and improved so they stay welcoming, accessible and enjoyable for everyone.
Will not support open drug use. Supports recovery programs and enforcement. Wants all appropriate partners working together so London is safe, affordable and livable for everyone.
Wants a homelessness response that goes beyond temporary housing to deeper problems, including addiction. Says council appears not to have weighed the illicit drug use that comes with housing hubs.
Says health care is the province's job and it is falling short; London cannot handle this crisis alone. Would push for better access to treatment and long-term support.
Says nonprofits serving people with addiction or mental health issues bring safety and a bridge to care, easing strain on health care and emergency services. Backs multi-year funding for them.
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 3, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“Full fiscal transparency and responsibility at City Hall. I am running a no-impact, grass roots campaign to demonstrate my commitment to this ideal.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“As a past Operations Manager in Private Security, this happened many times when it came to emergency situations at various events. In the end, the decision is always made to keep people safe and out of harm's way, regardless of any inconvenience it may cause.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“Unfortunately I do not have a response to this question as I would require more information to adequately base my opinion on it.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“Fiscal transparency and responsibility. Residents of London need to feel their tax dollars are cared for and used in an appropriate manner.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“As a well-seasoned expert in the field of private security I have run flawless events for the city of London, keeping all patrons safe and out of harm's way. This includes, but is not limited to, events at Western University campus, Victoria Park, Downtown London and Harris Park.”
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 13, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“At the doors and in the community, I see that more is at stake in this election than any candidate's platform. London is becoming divided into us and them, yours and mine, have and have not, yes and no. We are expected to pick a side on everything. That is no way to run a city.
By 2030, I want residents to see a council that can disagree without becoming incapable of progress: one that finds common ground, makes balanced decisions and speaks with a stronger voice when advocating to Queen's Park and Ottawa. Polarization weakens us. London will achieve more when we work together.
I would give up the comfort of always pleasing one side, and I would compromise on the route when it helps us reach a better result. I would not give up honesty, evidence or the needs of the people I represent.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“In my work in sales, I once needed a national buyer to agree to a very large contract with a long rollout. Although they initially wanted to pick the lower priced bid.
My first proposal was not going to get everyone there. I spoke with the right department to understand what each actually needed. I changed my ask by offering training and service, The customer realized that I was going to bring better value than any of the other offers.
That experience taught me that bringing people together is not about pressuring them or splitting every difference down the middle. It is about listening, separating firm positions from underlying concerns, and finding a solution people can support. That is how I would approach serving as one member of a fifteen-person council.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“Residents may ask me to order more police patrols in their neighbourhood or direct police to deal with a particular person or location. I would tell them plainly that city council cannot direct police operations. Those decisions belong to the London Police Service under the leadership of the Chief, with civilian oversight from the London Police Service Board.
That would not mean shrugging and sending them away. I would document what residents are experiencing, help bring recurring concerns to the right people and press for clear answers about response times and service gaps. Council can also act through police funding, lighting, street design, bylaw enforcement, recreation and community supports.
A councillor should never pretend to have authority they do not possess. My responsibility would be to tell residents the truth, open the right doors and keep working with everyone involved to find a practical way forward.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“I want to be known for making growth work for the people who already live here and those who still need a place here.
I feel torn because London urgently needs more housing, and delaying construction increases costs. Residents are also right to ask whether roads, sewers, transit and other services can support that growth. They deserve a meaningful voice in decisions affecting their neighbourhoods.
The strongest argument against my position is that consultation and infrastructure expectations can become excuses to delay badly needed housing, and existing residents should not have a veto over who gets to live in their community. I take that seriously.
My answer is earlier consultation, clearer rules and better planning so good projects can proceed faster. London cannot remain frozen in place, but growth should leave us with complete communities, not simply more buildings.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“For more than twenty years, I have coached martial arts, working with youth and adults from many different backgrounds and with different abilities, including autistic young people.
Coaching is not standing at the front of a room and expecting everyone to respond in the same way. It means listening, adapting how you communicate, recognizing what each person needs and helping people with different strengths work toward a common goal. It also requires honesty and accountability. You cannot promise that something will be easy, but you can make sure nobody is dismissed or left behind.
That is how I would approach public service. I would meet people where they are, be clear about what is possible and keep looking for a way forward when the first answer is no.”
No responseSent September 3
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →
What Ward 10 was wrestling with
The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.
■ CITY DECIDES
When what's built isn't what was approved
Candidate Alexander Moore's platform explicitly opposes "post-approval (bait-and-switch) changes to developments," suggesting this has been a live local frustration, though no specific Ward 10 case was independently verified in this research.
Put them on the record
Name one change you'd make so what gets built matches what council approved.
■ CITY DECIDES
What's happening at Westmount Mall?
Development pace and quality in the Westmount area is a live local frustration. Farhi Holdings Corporation bought Westmount Mall in August 2025 with stated plans for mixed-use redevelopment including apartments on the site, and has since renamed the property Westmount Commons, the name the City's own 2026 documents now use. Candidate Lois Margaret Ward told CBC News she is unhappy with the pace of development at Westmount Mall, saying "there's been some unwise choices" and calling for development to be "managed a little more intelligently."
The honest numbers ▾
CBC News reported the acquisition on August 14, 2025. A London Free Press report put the purchase price at $40 million, but that outlet blocks automated reading and the figure could not be checked directly, so treat it as reported, not verified. No sale price appears in the sources we could read. CBC News ↗
Put them on the record
What would you support, and what would you block, in the next phase of development around Westmount Mall?
■ CITY DECIDES
More office space at Westmount, or a healthier downtown?
Westmount Development London Corporation has applied (city file OZ-26061) to raise the amount of office space allowed at 755-765, 785 and 815 Wonderland Road South. No new tower is involved: the plan reworks space inside the existing two-storey enclosed mall so it can land one large office tenant relocating from elsewhere in London. City staff recommended refusing it. Their reasoning is the reason this is more than a Ward 10 story: they argue pulling a large office tenant to Wonderland Road works against downtown, and downtown London still has one of the emptiest office markets in the country (see the Ward 13 file).
The honest numbers ▾
The application would lift the cap on office space at the site from 10,000 to 22,500 square metres, allowing up to 12,500 square metres for a single tenant. The July 14, 2026 report from Deputy City Manager Scott Mathers recommends the amendment "BE REFUSED" because "the increased amount of office space is significant and undermines the role and future health of the Downtown as the primary office destination in the City." City of London staff report, July 14, 2026 ↗
Put them on the record
Would you vote to allow more office space at Westmount if it pulls a large tenant out of downtown? Answer yes or no before you explain.
■ CITY DECIDES
The Westmount office plan was still undecided as of August 2
The application was not rejected. On July 14, 2026 the Planning and Environment Committee heard delegations and then referred it to a future committee meeting, expressly "for the reason of allowing the applicant and representatives additional time to obtain a suitable level of tenant commitment." Downtown London filed a written communication dated July 4, 2026. The City's own application page still shows no council resolution, so anyone who tells you this was approved or killed is ahead of the record.
Should the city decide this application on its merits, or keep holding it while the applicant hunts for a tenant?
■ CITY DECIDES
A tribunal, not council, approved the Westmount redevelopment
In February 2024 the Ontario Land Tribunal approved a settlement between the City and the site's then-owner permitting mixed-use redevelopment of the Westmount lands at up to three, eight and twelve storeys. Council never passed it. The owner appealed after council did not decide the application, the two sides settled, and the Tribunal changed the city's Official Plan and zoning by-law itself. The City was a consenting party to the settlement, but the approval itself was the Tribunal's, and any specific number of housing units for this site does not come from the Tribunal's order.
The honest numbers ▾
OLT-23-000367 and OLT-23-000368, 785 Wonderland Road Inc. v. London (City), city file OZ-9565, issued February 26, 2024. The order sets heights of three storeys, eight storeys and twelve storeys across three areas and adds some permitted uses. It states no number of housing units and no office floor area at all. Ontario Land Tribunal decision, February 26, 2024 ↗
Put them on the record
When a tribunal settles a file council never voted on, what would you change about how the city handles those appeals?
■ CITY DECIDES
Wonderland Road's future
Council halted a roughly $212-million plan to widen Wonderland Road to six lanes in September 2021 over climate and environmental concerns, and the road's role was folded into the city's long-range Mobility Master Plan. That halt did not settle the question: council reopened the widening in 2025, covered in the next card.
The honest numbers ▾
The "Discover Wonderland" environmental assessment carried a roughly $212-million price tag; council halted it on a 9–5 vote in September 2021. CBC News ↗
Put them on the record
Would you vote to fund widening Wonderland Road to six lanes?
■ CITY DECIDES
The widening is back on the table, not shelved
The 2021 halt is often described as the end of the story. It wasn't. On April 1, 2025 council directed staff to revisit widening Wonderland Road to six lanes and to open talks with neighbouring municipalities and the province about a ring road around London. As of this research those talks were still at an early stage and no further progress could be found, so there is no route, no cost and no timeline to point at yet.
The honest numbers ▾
Council's April 1, 2025 direction to revisit the Wonderland widening and pursue ring-road talks passed 12 to 3. CBC News ↗
Put them on the record
The widening study is alive again. Do you want six lanes built, redesigned, or stopped for good?
■ CITY DECIDES
A 5,000-unit subdivision cleared its first hurdle, in this ward
The biggest live growth file in Ward 10 after Westmount: a draft plan of subdivision at 3080 and 3514 Bostwick Road, 1875 Wharncliffe Road South and 3341 Wonderland Road South, where those three roads converge. The application (MHBC Planning, file 39T-25507/OZ-26066) proposes low-, medium- and high-density residential and mixed uses, open space along the Thornicroft Drain, parks, and seven new neighbourhood streets. The Planning and Environment Committee held its public meeting on August 11, 2026; CBC reports the committee cleared the proposal's first hurdle at more than 5,000 units. This is committee stage, not a built subdivision: the City's application page listed the council resolution as not yet available at our August 16 check, and draft-plan conditions and later approvals still follow.
Whoever wins this seat will hold it while 5,000 units get their remaining approvals. What conditions would you push for on roads, transit and parks before the homes go in?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
The big three: homelessness, safety, roads
A non-scientific CBC London reader survey of 330+ respondents ahead of the 2026 election found homelessness, open drug use and roads as the top-ranked concerns citywide, with affordability, crime and transit also ranking high. This is citywide data, not a Ward 10 measurement.
Put them on the record
Name one thing you'd fund on homelessness or open drug use that's actually council's to decide.
WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
August 8, 2026 region audit: Bostwick added — the planning district is 100% Ward 10 (checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (scripts/check-ward-regions.mjs)). The Westmount boundary caveat previously carried in the region line moves here: the district is 99% Ward 10.
Resolved August 17, 2026. Through the summer this page carried open notes about whether the sitting councillor would run: that he was absent from the July 31 candidate list, that a Wikipedia claim citing a May 8 London Free Press article could not be read to confirm his intentions, and that the seat label had been moved from "open seat" to "contested" because nothing supported either reading. Paul Van Meerbergen filed on August 16 and appears on the City's official list, so the question is settled and the seat label now reads incumbent. His voting record was added to the scorecard the following day; see the footnote there for how the roll calls were read.
A July 9, 2026 item from "Downstream News Media" (conceptclarity.ca) claiming staff opposed a 10-storey office building at Westmount and that it "has been rejected" was checked and discarded. Both load-bearing facts are false: the application is an interior reconfiguration of the existing two-storey mall, not a 10-storey building (the "10 storeys" looks like a garbling of "10,000 square metres"), and committee referred it rather than rejecting it. No mainstream outlet corroborates the item and the outlet appears to be an aggregator. It is not cited anywhere on this page.
Naming trap on the Westmount property: Farhi Holdings renamed the mall "Westmount Commons" and the City's 2026 documents use that name. Searching only for "Westmount Mall" will miss current coverage and city files. Search both.
No reliable count of housing units for the Westmount lands could be verified, and none is published here. Figures circulating online do not hold up: an "over 1,000 units" number traces to Farhi Holdings' own press release rather than a City document, and figures of about 900 units, 30,000 square metres of office space, 55 metres and 18 storeys appear on the site Propertied.ca while the primary Ontario Land Tribunal decision contradicts the heights (three, eight and twelve storeys) and contains no unit or floor-area figure at all. A "~900 units" figure appears in a 2023 decision only as a description of what the applicant applied for, which is a proposal, not an approval. A trustworthy number would have to come from the Tribunal's schedules or a london.ca staff report.
The Westmount office application (OZ-26061) had no council decision as of August 2, 2026. Watch for it returning to a Planning and Environment Committee agenda; the referral was open-ended, tied to the applicant securing tenant commitment, so there is no scheduled date to check against.
The Wonderland Road widening and ring-road direction of April 1, 2025 was verified through CBC and CTV coverage, but no route, cost, timeline or progress report on the intermunicipal and provincial talks could be found as of August 2, 2026. Treat it as revived and stalled, not as a project.
New Ward 10 boundaries were not independently confirmed at street/neighbourhood level; the official ward map PDF could not be rendered by the research tools. Verify against the City's interactive ward map before relying on the neighbourhood description. Ward 10 was not on the city's list of post-approval map amendments (only Wards 1, 4, 11, 13 were), so its shape is likely close to the adopted Final Option 1 map, but this is an inference, not a confirmed description.
Citywide issue-survey data (homelessness/drugs/roads) is not ward-specific and is included only as likely relevant context, not a measured Ward 10 finding.
Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the final candidate list on August 24, 2026.
ADDED August 16, 2026: new issue card on the Bostwick/Wharncliffe/Wonderland subdivision (39T-25507/OZ-26066). Dates and status verified on the City's application page (PEC public meeting August 11, 2026; council resolution not yet posted). The 'more than 5,000 units' figure and the committee outcome come from CBC London's August 12 coverage ('Council committee clears first hurdle for 5,000-unit subdivision in southwest London'); the City page does not state a unit count and the CBC article body could not be fully retrieved in this pass. Re-check after the next full council meeting for the ratified outcome.