This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 6 today: your councillor and the record →
DECIDED · OCT 26, 2026
Ward 6, 2026
Central-north London: Old North · Western University · Gibbons Park
Incumbent Sam Trosow, first elected in 2022, faces three challengers, none of whom has previously held elected office. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. In a ward that takes in Western University's campus and Old North, the race turns on speeding and cut-through traffic, oversized infill builds, student rentals, and north rapid transit. Ward 6 appears to have kept largely the same boundaries in the December 2024 redraw.
Sam Trosow is the incumbent, elected Ward 6 councillor in 2022 with 2,082 votes (48.11%) of three candidates, per the City's certified results.
The rest of the field, in alphabetical order: Ian Sterling Leishman, Stephanie Marentette, and Naomi Nadea.
Who ran
Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.
QUESTIONNAIRE3 of 4 in this ward have answered
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
ILIan Sterling Leishman
SMStephanie Marentette
NNNaomi Nadea
STSam TrosowIncumbent Ward 6 councillor
Scroll sideways to compare all 4 candidates →
1 of 4
Who they are
Real estate broker and Old South Business Association president, formerly a manager at 103.1 Fresh Radio. Born and raised in Ward 6. Running on affordability, safety and cutting wasteful spending.
Civil litigation lawyer and former London Transit Commission chair who lives in Ward 6. Running on responsible development, better city services and reasonable property taxes.
Community advocate, including for 2SLGBTQIA+ residents, and licensed security guard downtown. Born in Saint Lucia and lives in Ward 6. Running on community safety, health care and creating jobs.
Ward 6 councillor since 2022 and retired Western professor. Formerly practised law in California. Running on housing and homelessness, transit, and environmental and planning policy.
Care and wraparound support together with enforcement for repeat offences. Supports declaring a state of emergency to press Ontario and Ottawa to fund health care, which the City cannot.
Prevent new homelessness first by working with developers on geared-to-income units. Back supportive housing like Indwell, and add social workers and nurses to the downtown special constable pilot.
Wants more affordable, supportive and transitional housing and shelter space. Would turn vacant or underused buildings into safe housing, and back earlier help for people facing eviction.
Prevent displacement by making renovictions, harassment and neglect-driven evictions harder. Fund deeply affordable, supportive housing. Says only Ontario can close the critical funding gaps that remain.
What would they do about roads, traffic and transit?
Slow vehicles in neighbourhoods and coordinate road work better. Wants on-time, more frequent transit without tax increases well above inflation. Expand the Thames Valley Parkway for safer cycling.
Fund conventional transit and paratransit, with more vans, drivers and hours. Supports the Old North traffic-calming pilot to protect walkers and cyclists, with a study before it becomes permanent.
Run transit beyond daytime hours for shift workers, and improve frequency, reliability and paratransit. Wants road projects finished on time and tickets for cars parked in bus zones.
Plan and fund the remaining north and west rapid transit lines. Fund the city's planned cycling and walking projects. Speed up neighbourhood traffic-safety requests across London with more staff.
What would they do on addiction and mental health?
Would accept a dedicated 0.5% to 1% provincial tax for addiction, mental health and homelessness, with measurable results. Wants police focused on violence and property crime.
Says a psychiatric hospital is Ontario's job, not the City's. Wants wraparound supports, stable housing and easier access to mental health services for people with addictions or mental illness.
Opposes open drug use. Wants tougher trafficking enforcement and faster treatment and recovery. Would explore a separate opioid centre to ease hospital emergency pressure.
Wants a plan the City sticks to, focused on what it controls. Expand community-based responses and better recognize front-line workers. Warns against blame, shaming and stereotyping.
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 10, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“The one thing I most want to change is for Londoners, especially residents of Ward 6, to feel genuinely heard and represented at City Hall. Residents should have a councillor who is accessible, responsive, accountable, and willing to advocate for them while working constructively with Council to get results.
By 2030, I want residents to see a City focused on doing the basics well: safe and maintained roads, effective traffic calming, safe parks, a downtown families can enjoy, support for those who need it most, responsible development, and reliable public transit.
I also want them to see responsible financial management. A 26.9% tax increase over four years makes affordability harder. While costs rise, I believe tax increases should generally stay near inflation through careful budgeting and disciplined spending.
I am willing to give up politically easy or comfortable decisions when necessary to deliver better results for residents.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“When I managed 103.1 Fresh Radio in London, I wanted to invest in more on-air staff to strengthen our local connection, ratings, and revenue. Senior decision-makers disagreed, concerned about financial risk and whether the investment would pay off.
My original ask was for the full investment. When that did not gain support, I proposed a smaller pilot with clear measures for audience growth and return on investment, supported by examples of similar successes elsewhere.
What I gave up was immediacy and certainty. I accepted a temporary, smaller investment that had to prove itself before expanding.
The pilot built confidence and led to broader support. At peak staffing, Fresh Radio had the most listeners in the city and achieved record revenue, with EBITDA reaching 48%.
I learned that consensus often comes from reducing risk, providing evidence, and compromising on the path without losing sight of the goal.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“The first thing that comes to mind is homelessness.
Residents will ask City Council to fix the homelessness crisis. I would be clear: Council cannot solve it alone.
London can provide shelter, housing supports, food and connections to services. But the City does not control Ontario’s health-care system, including the mental-health and addiction treatment many people urgently need. That responsibility rests primarily with the provincial government. The federal government also plays a major role in funding housing and homelessness programs.
I would push both governments for sustained action and funding, and ask the mayor to consider declaring a state of emergency on homelessness. I would also work through municipal organizations to demand stronger provincial and federal support.
Jurisdiction cannot become an excuse for inaction. I would use Council’s voice relentlessly to bring all three governments together and push for real solutions.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“The issue I most want to be known for is being an accessible, accountable and responsive councillor who delivers for Ward 6.
Residents consistently tell me they want the City to get the basics right: safer roads, reliable transit, well-maintained parks, sensible development, support for those who need it and a downtown families can enjoy.
Where I feel torn is balancing those expectations with what the city can reasonably afford. With property taxes rising 26.9% over four years, I believe Council must be especially mindful of seniors and residents on fixed incomes.
The strongest argument against my position is that maintaining and improving services costs money. London is growing, infrastructure is aging, and wages and construction costs are rising.
That is why I will focus on value and accountability: scrutinizing spending, questioning excessive costs, working collaboratively and ensuring every dollar delivers the best possible result for residents.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“One example I’m especially proud of is initiating the Corus Radiothon for Children’s Hospital in London.
While managing 103.1 Fresh Radio, I proposed bringing Corus Entertainment’s London radio stations together for a joint radiothon supporting Children’s Health Foundation and Children’s Hospital. I worked with our Corus team and community partners to help turn that idea into reality.
The Radiothon went on to raise significant funds and awareness for children’s health care in London.
That experience reflects how I approach community leadership: identify an opportunity, bring people and organizations together, use available resources effectively, and follow through.
I have taken the same approach in other community roles, including supporting charitable organizations and, today, serving as President of the Old South Business Association, where I advocate for local businesses and better communication and access during major City construction projects. www.ianleishman.ca”
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 3, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“I want London to be demonstrably safer. By 2030, residents should be able to see cleaner, better-maintained public spaces, stronger neighbourhood engagement, improved emergency preparedness, safer transit and public areas, and a City that responds to concerns instead of simply documenting them.
Safety means more than policing. It means addressing homelessness, addiction, intimate-partner violence, unsafe infrastructure, emergency response, traffic safety and disaster preparedness together.
I would be willing to give up political convenience and the temptation to simply vote with the majority. If a decision is unpopular but necessary to protect residents, I will stand behind it. I would rather lose a political argument than compromise someone's safety.
My measure of success is simple: people should feel safer living, working, visiting and raising their families in London.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“As an immigrant Black Transgender woman, much of my community advocacy has involved entering rooms where I was not necessarily the person everyone initially invited or agreed with. I learned that demanding agreement rarely works. Listening does.
When advocating for marginalized communities, I have had to explain concerns in terms that different groups could understand, including community organizations, public institutions and people who did not share my experiences.
I changed my approach by focusing less on what separated us and more on the outcome we shared: safer, more inclusive and stronger communities. I was willing to modify how I presented an issue and to accept that not every part of my original proposal would survive the discussion.
What I gave up was the need to be right about everything. What I gained was cooperation—and cooperation is how you accomplish things in public life.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“Healthcare is one of the clearest examples. Residents may ask their councillor to fix hospital wait times, increase the number of doctors and nurses, or directly change hospital operations. City Council does not control Ontario's healthcare system.
I would tell residents that honestly rather than pretend City Hall has powers it does not possess. The Province of Ontario and the healthcare system have authority over those areas.
But saying "that's not our jurisdiction" cannot mean "that's not our problem."
I would bring London's concerns to the provincial government, work with healthcare institutions and community organizations, support municipal actions that improve emergency preparedness and community safety, and use Council's political voice to advocate for the resources London needs.
Residents deserve a councillor who knows the limits of municipal authority, but is willing to push every responsible level of government to do its job.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“I want to be known for public safety.
I believe Londoners have a right to safe streets, parks, transit, businesses and neighbourhoods. I also believe that people experiencing homelessness, addiction, mental-health challenges or other crises deserve appropriate help rather than simply being treated as problems.
The strongest argument against my position is that a stronger emphasis on enforcement can sometimes push vulnerable people from one location to another without addressing the underlying problem.
That criticism deserves to be taken seriously.
My position is therefore not "enforcement instead of compassion." It is enforcement and compassion, with accountability. Illegal activity that threatens other residents cannot simply be ignored, but neither should someone in crisis be abandoned.
I want measurable results: safer public spaces, faster connections to appropriate services, better emergency response and fewer people trapped in recurring cycles of crisis.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“Before this campaign, I was already involved in community advocacy, particularly around inclusion, public safety and London's 2SLGBTQIA+ community. I have worked with community organizations and participated in initiatives intended to build stronger relationships between marginalized communities, institutions and the broader public.
That work was recognized by Pride London, which selected me as its 2026 Parade Grand Marshal. Pride London describes my work as including advocacy, inclusion, community safety, belonging and community leadership.
I have also participated in community and civic initiatives, including being a former Director at Large for Urban League London, and applying to serve on a City of London community advisory committee.
My approach to public service is therefore not something I developed because I decided to run for Council. The campaign is an extension of work I was already doing in the community.
More information about my platform and community work is available at naominadea.ca.”
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 17, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“There are so many issues where I want to see changes. They range from housing and homelessness, to mobility and transit, to the environment & planning and many others.
But what ties them all together, and what I want to see over the next council term is an increase in civic engagement and public participation. I sense a growing frustration from so many Londoners who feel they are not being heard by decision-makers in city hall. This despite the persistent public participation meetings and notices to “get involved”.
The way council engages with the public has to change. And we need to begin with asking some difficult questions about why we are not connecting with public
The next council must develop a better understanding of why civic engagement is so low and how these barriers to participation can be addressed.
This will take a lot of time and effort.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“Over the course of the council term I have raised a number of concerns and criticisms about how the municipal compliance division responds to code-enforcement complaints. This is especially so regarding prooerty standards and noise complaints. Over the course of the council term, I have worked persistently behind the scenes with staff who came to agree with some the changes I wanted to make. This includes how complaints are responded to and how noise complaints are handled.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“Residents want to see more progress made in combatting homelessness and dealing with mental health and addiction problems in London. Many often get very impatient, even angry, that the city does not do more to resolve these problems. It has become a very decisive and polarizing issue.
Yet the city lacks the financial ability to properly fund the need for adequate affordable housing and necessary services to address mental health and addiction issues. We simply cannot afford to do what needs to be done given our very restrictive and regressive property tax system.
While our advocacy work with the provincial and federal is ongoing and active, there needs to be a better understanding on the limits of what a municipality can do.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“While I work together with several council colleagues on issues like transit, housing and the environment; the issue I most want to be known for is better support for the music, arts, and cultural sector.
I believe the creative sector is underfunded. But it is essential to our economic development and to our personal well-being.
The main barrier is the persistent argument that the arts sector is “nice to have” but not a priority…. and not worthy of public funding.
I have opposed this “back-to-basics” view. But the arguments that arts groups and institutions like the library and museum should not get much public support continues to persist.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“I have had a long history of civic engagement in London and at UWO since moving here in 2001 which I outline in greater detail at VoteTrosow.ca”
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →
What Ward 6 was wrestling with
The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.
■ CITY DECIDES
Speeding and cut-through traffic in Old North
Residents have told the City about speeding, cut-through traffic, and streets that feel unsafe to walk or bike. The Central North London Traffic Study (the area bounded by Richmond Street, Oxford Street, the Thames River, and Adelaide Street, largely the Old North part of Ward 6) backed that input with traffic counts, speed studies, and collision history. Councillor Trosow has been directly involved in convening resident input on this file. The study has since produced a specific recommended plan, a package that steers vehicles onto designated "Neighbourhood Connectors" rather than through "Neighbourhood Streets." Public comment on that plan has now closed and the final report is still to come, so the decision lands with the next council.
The honest numbers ▾
The comment period on the recommended plan closed July 22, 2026. The final report incorporating public input is pending; what it will recommend is not yet public. City of London (Get Involved project page) ↗
Put them on the record
Which Old North street would you calm first, and what exactly would you put on it?
■ CITY DECIDES
Big new builds on old streets
Neighbours in Old North have fought large new-build infill homes they say clash with the streetscape of an established, partly heritage-character neighbourhood. These homes get approved by the City's Committee of Adjustment through zoning variances. The tension is citywide, but it has been reported specifically in Old North.
The honest numbers ▾
In one Victoria Street case, the allowable floor area was increased from roughly 4,000 to 7,400 square feet by variance. CBC News ↗
Put them on the record
When an infill proposal needs variances that neighbours oppose, what test would you apply before supporting it?
■ CITY DECIDES
Student rentals and nuisance party houses
Party houses are a recurring headache here: Old North, alongside Richmond Row and Downtown, is one of the areas most affected by unlicensed or poorly regulated short-term and student rentals. A City staff report tied nuisance party houses to unlimited-guest occupancy, called them a recurring enforcement challenge, and recommended tighter occupancy limits and higher fines. This is no longer a proposal. Municipal Council passed three by-laws on Tuesday, March 31, 2026, each stating it comes into force on the day it is passed, so all three have been in effect since that date. They raised the penalties for renting out a place without a short-term accommodation licence, changed the licence fees, and tightened Schedule 21 of the business licensing by-law.
The honest numbers ▾
Renting out a place without a valid short-term accommodation host (Provider) licence now draws $1,500 for a first offence, $2,500 for a second, and $5,000 for a third or later one. A booking platform operating without a valid Broker licence faces $10,000, then $15,000, then $20,000. The previous penalty was a flat $500 either way. The $10,000 tier applies to booking platforms, not to homeowners who rent through a company. Staff noted there are currently no licensed Brokers in London, and only one brokerage, Airbnb, has begun the licensing process. City of London staff report, Appendix C (penalty schedule) ↗
Put them on the record
Name one enforcement change you'd make for nuisance party houses that doesn't shrink student housing.
■ CITY DECIDES
What the short-term rental rules now require
The occupancy cap Old North residents pushed for did pass, with exemptions added. Council exempted hosted short-term accommodations, meaning places where the operator is living on site, and raised the age of children who don't count toward the cap. A separate limit on how many short-term rentals one person can run takes effect October 1, 2026, which is the change most likely to be felt on a street with several rental houses on it.
The honest numbers ▾
The enacted by-law allows no more than two individuals per bedroom, not counting children under 13, with an exemption for qualifying hosted accommodations. From October 1, 2026, one provider may operate only one short-term rental. City of London Business Licensing By-law L.-131-16 (consolidated) ↗
Put them on the record
Would you keep the hosted-rental exemption from the two-people-per-bedroom cap, or close it?
■ CITY DECIDES
How the short-term rental changes passed
The record here is easy to get wrong, so the sequence matters. At committee on March 9, 2026, a motion to rewrite the occupancy cap failed 2 to 3. A later amendment at council on March 31 added the hosted-accommodation exemption and raised the child exclusion from "under 2" to "aged twelve and under"; it passed 12 to 3 and 13 to 2 on its two parts, and the package then passed 14 to 1 and became law the same day.
The honest numbers ▾
Committee approved the staff recommendation 5 to 0, after Councillor Pribil's rewrite motion failed 2 to 3. At council on March 31, 2026, part (a) of the weakening amendment passed 12 to 3, part (b) passed 13 to 2, and the main motion as amended passed 14 to 1. The three by-laws are A-54-26021 (Bill 134), A-62-26002 (Bill 135), and L.-131(n)-103 (Bill 140). Municipal Council minutes, March 31, 2026 ↗
Put them on the record
Do you agree with exempting hosted rentals from the occupancy cap, and would you revisit it?
■ CITY DECIDES
What a short-term rental licence now costs
The March 2026 changes folded the fire and property standards inspection cost into the licence fee, so a new host pays one larger amount up front instead of the old $196 licence plus a separate inspection charge. The City's published fee and the fee written into the enacted by-law differ by $5, and nothing we found explains the gap, so both figures are shown rather than picking one.
The honest numbers ▾
london.ca (page last modified July 29, 2026) lists a new provider licence at $552, including a one-time $351 Fire and Property Standards inspection fee, with annual renewal at $201. The enacted by-law replaced the $196 licence fee with $547, which is $196 plus the $351 inspection. The $351 inspection fee is verified in force; the $547 versus $552 difference is unexplained by any source we checked. City of London (short-term accommodation licensing) ↗
Put them on the record
Is the licence fee set high enough to pay for real inspection and enforcement capacity, and how many officers would you fund?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
Homelessness and encampments along the river
Encampments have concentrated along the Thames Valley Parkway and in Gibbons Park, both partly within Ward 6. Homelessness is a citywide issue, but the riverside is where it lands here. Council's 2024 Community Encampment Plan set buffer-zone rules, including no encampments within 100 metres of a residence with a habitable dwelling, which affect riverside areas like Old North.
Put them on the record
What would you vote to fund for the encampment response in riverside parks like Gibbons Park?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
Renovictions and tenant protections
Many Ward 6 residents rent, in purpose-built buildings and student housing, so landlord-tenant policy hits home here; the underlying tenancy law is provincial. Council passed a renoviction bylaw in 2024, but amendments pushed by councillors Trosow, Rahman, and McAlister for stronger tenant compensation and relocation requirements were voted down. One year on, the tenant group ACORN reads the bylaw as having helped slow bad-faith renovictions, while very few landlords have taken out the repair licence the bylaw requires, and a city committee is weighing changes. Read this one cautiously: the provincial eviction-filing data underneath it is incomplete.
The honest numbers ▾
As of May 2026, only seven applications for the special Rental Unit Repair Licence had been received since the bylaw took effect. ACORN says N13 renoviction filings are down overall, but the underlying provincial N13 data is too incomplete to draw firm conclusions. CBC News, May 22, 2026 ↗
Put them on the record
What specifically would you change about London's renoviction bylaw, if anything?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
North rapid transit through the ward
London's 2050 Mobility Master Plan proposes a north Bus Rapid Transit leg along Wharncliffe Road and Western Road, through or next to the Western University campus, to a hub at Masonville Mall. It replaces an earlier Richmond Street alignment that council rejected. The City asked the province for capital funding for the leg, reported in January 2026. As of August 2, 2026, no provincial decision on that request had been found; the ask appears to still be unanswered.
The honest numbers ▾
The City is seeking roughly $100 million in provincial capital funding for the north BRT leg. CBC News ↗
Put them on the record
Do you support the Wharncliffe/Western routing for north rapid transit, and what happens if provincial funding doesn't come?
WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
New Ward 6 boundary not independently confirmed from a primary map or PDF: the boundary description (Adelaide/Oxford/Wonderland/Thames) and the "kept largely the same lines" conclusion come from search-result summaries of City materials, not a direct read of the Final Report PDF or the interactive ArcGIS ward map.
CBC.ca articles returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch in the July 2 pass; on July 3, 2026 both CBC articles cited on this page were fetched in full and the quoted figures (4,000-to-7,400-sq-ft Victoria Street variance; ~$100M provincial ask for the north BRT leg via Wharncliffe/Western Road to Masonville) were verified against the article text. The Global News source was also fetched in full and verified. The Western Gazette source verified in that pass (staff's recommended short-term rental fines) has since been dropped from this page: the by-laws were enacted March 31, 2026, so the page now cites the City's own penalty schedule and council minutes instead of a report on a proposal.
The Central North London Traffic Study timeline was internally inconsistent in sources retrieved during the July passes (a town hall date after the stated feedback deadline). Resolved as of August 2, 2026 against the City's Get Involved project page: a recommended plan went out for public feedback and the comment period closed July 22, 2026, with the final report still pending. What that final report will recommend is unknown and is not stated here.
Short-term accommodation licence fee discrepancy, unresolved: the by-law enacted March 31, 2026 replaced the $196 provider licence fee with $547 ($196 licence + $351 inspection, which sums visibly), but london.ca (last modified July 29, 2026) publishes $552 for a new provider licence with $201 annual renewal. No source found explains the $5 gap. Both figures are shown on this page rather than silently picking one. The $351 Fire and Property Standards inspection fee is verified in force in both sources.
Sourcing caution for short-term accommodation rules: london.ca's plain-language short-term accommodation page still says only that an unhosted operator "may offer no more than five bedrooms" and omits the two-people-per-bedroom cap entirely. The cap on this page is therefore cited to the consolidated business licensing by-law and the March 31, 2026 council minutes, not to the City's FAQ page. General lesson for this project: the City's friendly explainer pages lag and simplify; the by-laws and eScribe minutes are the authority.
The renoviction bylaw one-year read is deliberately cautious. ACORN's assessment that bad-faith renovictions have slowed, and that N13 filings are down overall, rests on provincial N13 data that is too incomplete to support a firm conclusion. This page reports it as a tenant group's read plus one hard count (seven repair-licence applications), not as a proven outcome.
No provincial decision was found on the roughly $100 million ask for the north BRT leg (submitted to Queen's Park, reported January 2026). Absence of a decision in the sources checked is not proof none exists; the page says only that the ask appears unanswered as of August 2, 2026.
Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the list on August 24.