This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 11 today: your councillor and the record →
DECIDED · OCT 26, 2026
Ward 11, 2026
Central-south London: Old South · Wortley Village · Southcrest · Berkshire Village · Manor Park · The Coves, extending west of Wharncliffe Road South along the Base Line corridor
Ward 11 is a three-candidate race. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the final candidate list on August 24, 2026. The ward is one where Old South's heritage rules collide with the city's push for more housing. Council also amended this ward's boundary; what changed couldn't be confirmed, so check the city's ward map. Ward 11 was one of four wards, along with Wards 1, 4, and 13, where council adjusted the boundary beyond the base population-balance option.
Two candidates carry a prior election record. Denise Brown served as Ward 11's councillor from 2010 to 2014; she ran again in 2014, finishing second with 2,531 votes (28.36%) of six candidates, per the City's official results. Skylar Franke, the incumbent, was first elected in 2022, winning with 3,616 votes (57.68%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results.
The rest of the field: Harinder Kumar.
Who ran
Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.
QUESTIONNAIRE1 of 2 in this ward have answered · 1 could not be sent
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
DBDenise Brown
SFSkylar FrankeIncumbent Ward 11 councillor
HKHarinder Kumar
Scroll sideways to compare all 3 candidates →
1 of 3
Who they are
Self-employed, and describes an approachable, problem-solving style available outside nine to five. Ward 11 councillor from 2010 to 2014. Running on homelessness and addiction, housing and infrastructure, and city spending.
Ward 11 councillor since 2022, seeking re-election. Ran the London Environmental Network for five years before council. Running on housing and homelessness, affordable and safer communities, and environmental action.
Real estate salesperson (B.Eng and licensed millwright) and former Fanshawe Student Union director. Running on safe streets and accountable social spending, road maintenance, and support for small businesses and balanced housing.
Says something must be done about homelessness, but the same approach with ever more money and no results is not the solution. Says residents nearby don't feel safe taking their children downtown.
Calls homelessness a systemic failure, not a personal one, and supports housing first. Says housing over 2,300 unhoused people with healthcare and treatment needs provincial and federal funding.
Wants permanent housing, recovery and training to return to work, not short-term fixes. Wants shelter and social hub spending tracked, keeping what works and changing what does not.
Wants more bus service, 90% on-time buses, a smooth BRT rollout and protected, connected cycling routes, saying physical design keeps people safe. Pushes for the Wharncliffe and Horton underpass.
Wants more road money for resurfacing, not patching, and clear construction timelines. Wants more buses to cut long waits, and more speed bumps in Manor Park and Rowntree.
What would they do on addiction and mental health?
Names open drug use downtown among the reasons Brown is running. Says some residents face drug addiction and others safety and affordability, and each is a priority.
Says the drug crisis is a public health crisis that cannot be policed away. Wants more highly supportive housing, hubs and drop-in spaces, plus treatment and detox from other governments.
Supports combining outreach, treatment access and enforcement of public-safety rules on harmful public drug use. Says people in crisis should be treated with dignity and connected to supports.
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
Not sentNo email on file at time of sending out
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 3, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“By 2030, I want residents to see a city that is more accountable for the basic services people rely on every day. That means roads repaired on predictable schedules, major construction projects with clear public timelines, safer public spaces, and emergency services measured against transparent performance targets.
The change I most want is a culture where council sets measurable outcomes and reports back on whether they were achieved.
To make room for that, I would be willing to delay or vote against lower-priority discretionary projects that cannot show a clear, measurable public benefit, even when those projects are popular. I would rather protect funding for core infrastructure, public safety, and essential services than try to do everything at once.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“In a new-home negotiation, my clients wanted several price, layout, and upgrade changes that the builder was not prepared to accept as originally presented. I had to bring the builder and my clients toward a workable middle ground.
Instead of continuing with a long list of requests, I narrowed the ask to the changes that mattered most, separated must-haves from nice-to-haves, and focused the discussion on what could realistically be approved. We gave up some upgrades and flexibility on certain terms in exchange for agreement on the highest-priority items.
The deal was ultimately accepted. What I learned is that getting a decision is often less about repeating your original position and more about understanding what each side can live with, changing the ask without abandoning the objective, and knowing what you are prepared to give up.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“Residents may ask a councillor to direct police to target a particular street, individual, investigation, or day-to-day enforcement operation. City council cannot do that.
The London Police Service Board provides civilian governance and sets high-level policy and priorities, while the Chief of Police is responsible for day-to-day operations and specific investigations.
I would tell residents that plainly rather than promise authority I do not have. What I can do is bring recurring neighbourhood concerns forward, advocate for appropriate policing resources through the municipal budget process, communicate with the Police Service Board, ask for public reporting on trends and outcomes, and work on city-controlled measures such as lighting, road design, property standards, and community supports that can improve safety alongside policing.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“I most want to be known for improving public safety in neighbourhoods and public spaces.
The tension for me is that safety, homelessness, addiction, mental health, housing, and policing overlap, but they are not the same problem and cannot be solved with one tool. I believe residents should be able to use parks, streets, transit, and business areas safely, while people in crisis should be treated with dignity and connected to appropriate supports.
The strongest argument against an enforcement-focused position is that enforcement can move a visible problem from one place to another without addressing why it exists, while consuming resources that might produce better long-term results elsewhere. That is a fair criticism.
My approach would be to judge policies by measurable outcomes: whether public spaces become safer, whether repeat incidents decline, and whether people are actually moving toward stable housing and support.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“Before this campaign, I was elected in 2018 as a Director of the Fanshawe Student Union in London. The public election results show I received 1,966 votes, and the Student Administrative Council minutes record my participation in board meetings and motions.
It was a practical introduction to representative governance: listening to people with different priorities, working through an agenda, asking questions, making motions, and being accountable for decisions made as part of a board rather than as an individual.
That experience matters to how I would approach council. A councillor does not govern alone; the job requires preparation, listening, understanding procedure, working with people who disagree, and still being able to move decisions forward.
The FSU’s 2018 election results and 2018–19 council minutes are publicly available on its website.”
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →
What Ward 11 was wrestling with
The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
Protecting tenants when buildings get redeveloped
Tenants can lose their homes when a building is torn down, converted or redeveloped, and that has become a council flashpoint: the incumbent moved an April 2026 motion directing staff to develop protections for those tenants, and voted against a 30-unit renovation plan in November 2024 that would have displaced 15 basement-unit tenants (that motion lost). The timing matters: the work set in motion by the April 2026 motion is not expected to produce concrete measures during this term.
Name one protection for tenants displaced by redevelopment that council itself could pass.
■ CITY DECIDES
Old houses vs. new housing in Wortley
The Wortley Village–Old South Heritage Conservation District (designated 2015) limits redevelopment to protect the area's 1850–1930-era character, while the city pushes for more housing at the same time. A live example: a January 2026 Planning and Environment Committee staff report recommended flexibility to allow added housing at 10 Marley Place, one of the district's few larger parcels, despite the district's guidelines.
The honest numbers ▾
The January 6, 2026 Planning and Environment Committee report would retain the existing c.1878 house and its 4 units and add 8 new stacked-townhouse units at 2.5 storeys and a maximum height of 10.5 m: 4 + 8 = 12 units in total, subject to a Heritage Impact Assessment because the property sits in the Wortley Village-Old South Heritage Conservation District. City of London – Planning and Environment Committee agenda, January 6, 2026 (10 Marley Place staff report, OZ-25129) ↗
Put them on the record
When heritage-district guidelines and new housing collide, how should council decide which gives way?
■ CITY DECIDES
Flooding in older neighbourhoods
How to handle flooding and stormwater in the ward's older neighbourhoods is contested: the incumbent has publicly opposed requiring homeowners to disconnect weeping tiles, on climate and cost grounds, favouring green-infrastructure alternatives instead.
Put them on the record
Should the city require weeping-tile disconnections or fund green-infrastructure alternatives, and who pays?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
Homelessness and winter warming centres
How fast emergency warming centres open has been contested at council: a February 2026 co-moved motion set the trigger at -15°C with service-provider discretion at -5°C, after advocacy for faster openings during a -30°C cold snap in January 2025.
The honest numbers ▾
February 2026 motion: warming centres triggered at -15°C, with service-provider discretion to open at -5°C.
Put them on the record
Is the -15°C warming-centre trigger right, and if not, what number would you set?
■ CITY DECIDES
How much bus service to fund
The ward's councillor chairs the London Transit Commission. The 2024 multi-year budget added roughly 18,000 transit service hours over four years, and a further 2,000 hours were moved in 2025 from London Transit reserves (those are separate figures from the 2026 service-plan numbers below). The gap between what was planned and what was funded is now concrete: London Transit had to trim its own 2026 priorities to fit the approved budget, and the changes that survived take effect September 6, 2026.
The honest numbers ▾
London Transit's 2026 Service Plan (approved January 2026) proposed changes to 11 routes totalling more than 24,000 annualized service hours, but the approved budget funds only 18,000 hours, roughly 6,000 hours short, so priorities had to be trimmed. The changes take effect September 6, 2026. London Transit – 2026 Service Plan changes ↗
Put them on the record
London planned more than 24,000 hours of extra bus service and funded 18,000. Would you close that gap, and with what money?
■ CITY DECIDES
Thames Park and Thames Pool
Thames Park revitalization comes up again and again in the ward, and the pool question is settled in a way many residents have not caught up with: Thames Pool is being permanently removed, not reopened. What replaces it is park improvement work plus a study of whether an indoor pool is feasible.
The honest numbers ▾
Thames Pool is being permanently removed. The park improvements that replace it are a splash pad, pickleball and basketball courts, and an indoor-pool feasibility study, with construction anticipated to begin in summer 2026. Get Involved London – Thames Park ↗
Put them on the record
Thames Pool is gone for good. What do you commit to at Thames Park instead, and by what date?
■ CITY DECIDES
Who keeps an eye on empty houses
A vacant house at 131 Base Line Road West exploded shortly after 1 p.m. on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. The house was destroyed and one adult man was left in critical condition; the reporting does not establish whether he was inside or outside. The cause is undetermined and the Ontario Fire Marshal's Office is involved, so nothing here is a finding of fault against anyone. The municipal question it raises is oversight of empty buildings: the house had been vacant since the end of May, fire crews had been inspecting it monthly, and its natural gas service was still connected. Vacant-building rules, property standards and how much enforcement gets funded are council's own jurisdiction. One incident is not a trend and this is not a statement about how safe the ward is. On location: the address is in Ward 11, in the Southcrest neighbourhood roughly 2 km southwest of Wortley Village, not in Old South or Wortley Village. No news outlet states a ward, so that placement is a point-in-polygon check of the address against the City's own ward layers (see gaps).
The honest numbers ▾
Vacant since the end of May, inspected monthly by fire crews, natural gas service still active. Deputy Fire Chief Gary Bridge is the named fire-service source. The owner had held the property about two years and also owns two adjacent empty lots; a City zoning file titled "129-131 Base Line Road West" (Z-9578) exists. CBC News – owner of destroyed London, Ont. home astonished by explosion ↗
Put them on the record
What should the city require of an owner who leaves a house standing empty, and who is supposed to check?
WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
The ward placement of the July 29, 2026 Base Line Road West explosion is a derivation, not a reported fact. No outlet names a ward; every account says only "south London". The address at 131 Base Line Road West was tested by point-in-polygon query against the City of London's own ward layers, both the current map and the Election 2026 Wards layer that takes effect November 15, 2026 (https://opendata.london.ca/datasets/b9f64459c2ae4b18895fdfd4560163ca_9). It falls in Ward 11 on both, about 212 m from the nearest ward boundary with roughly 1.6 km of margin along the street axis, and the layer was ground-truthed against five known landmarks. Cite the City's ward data for the ward, never the news articles.
The cause of the July 29, 2026 explosion is officially undetermined, with the Ontario Fire Marshal's Office involved. Whether the injured man was inside or outside the house is not established. No causal or culpability framing should be added until the Fire Marshal reports, and the owner is not named on this page: he is a private individual and no fault has been established.
A CTV follow-up reports that, "according to a London city councillor", the property had many complaints against it. The councillor is not named in the article text (it is a video segment), so no councillor is named here and the complaints claim is not treated as established.
Ward 11 is commonly described as just Old South and Wortley Village, but it extends well west of Wharncliffe Road South along the Base Line corridor and takes in Southcrest. That habitual under-description is exactly why the July 29, 2026 explosion's ward placement was not obvious, and the region line has been widened accordingly.
Thames Pool background not carried on the page: CBC reported on two options floated to keep the pool operating, both carrying cost and risk (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/2-options-floated-to-keep-thames-pool-operating-but-both-have-cost-and-risk-1.6904485). The issue card cites the City's Thames Park engagement page instead, because the schema allows one source per card.
Ward 11's specific boundary amendment is unverified: it was confirmed as one of four wards council amended beyond the base recommendation (Dec 17, 2024), but not what the amendment actually changed. Consult the City's Ward Boundary Review final report or interactive ward map to describe the new footprint accurately.
The old Ward 11 community list (Old South, Wortley Village, Southcrest, Berkshire Village, Manor Park, The Coves) needs cross-checking against the new-boundary map before treating it as the ward going forward. RESOLVED (mostly) August 9, 2026 boundary audit against the official 2026 ward polygons: the Wortley Village-Old South Heritage Conservation District polygon (City Open Data, Community layer 6) samples 100% inside Ward 11; every address point on Cove Rd (19), Berkshire Dr (400) and Base Line Rd W (203) falls in Ward 11; Southcrest planning district is 97% Ward 11 (Aug 8 district audit). The region line's unverified flag is removed. Still unanchored: Manor Park has no city polygon, park, school or street carrying the name, so it rests on local usage.
Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the list on August 24.
One honest-numbers item on this page (homelessness and winter warming centres) doesn't yet link to a primary source; we're still tracking it down.