Skip to content
MENU

This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 4 today: your councillor and the record →

DECIDED · OCT 26, 2026

Ward 4, 2026

Northeast London: Carling · most of Stoneybrook · part of Huron Heights

1234567891011121314ALL RACES ↗

The result

CERTIFIED RESULTS · OCTOBER 28, 2026 · CITY OF LONDON

Ward 4 councillor
1 SEAT · 6,904 BALLOTS CAST
Ward 4 councillor results, ordered by votes
CANDIDATEVOTES
Tom CullELECTED2,428
Mario Jozic1,851
Stephen Orser920
Bob Wright838
Elivis Birindwa279
Bonnie Baleck184
Randi Prunner130
Ray Daamen64
Alan Lieknins60

The ward at a glance

Ward 4 is an open seat: Susan Stevenson is running for mayor, not re-election, and nine candidates are on the register after one withdrawal (Alicia Caskey withdrew before nominations closed). Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. With the map redrawn, the race turns on the northeast's own files: sidewalks, tree canopy, student rentals, safety. Old East Village is now in Ward 1.

Four candidates carry a prior election record. Ray Daamen ran for Ward 4 council in 2022, receiving 63 votes (1.68%), per the City's certified results. Mario Jozic ran for Ward 9 council in 2022, finishing second with 1,569 votes (22.75%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results. Stephen Orser served as Ward 4 councillor from 2006 to 2014; he ran for Ward 4 council again in 2022, finishing fifth with 365 votes (9.72%) of seven candidates, per the City's certified results. Bob Wright ran for Ward 3 council in 2022, finishing second with 1,026 votes (25.90%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results.

The rest of the field, in alphabetical order: Bonnie Baleck, Elivis Birindwa, Tom Cull, Alan Lieknins, and Randi Prunner.

Who ran

Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.

QUESTIONNAIRE2 of 8 in this ward have answered · 1 could not be sent
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
Bonnie Baleck
Elivis Birindwa
Tom Cull
Ray Daamen
Mario Jozic
Alan Lieknins
Stephen Orser
Randi Prunner
Bob Wright
Scroll sideways to compare all 9 candidates →
1 of 9
Who they are

No information found: no campaign site, survey answers or September 16 debate appearance. The City lists no contact details.

Source City candidate list · Checked October 11

Came to Canada at 13 as a refugee and grew up on Boullee Street. Criminology graduate of King's University College and a composite specialist; pushed for Ed Blake Park improvements.

Community partnership specialist at the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority and part-time Western professor. Co-founded the river cleanup group Antler River Rally and was London's poet laureate.

No information found: no campaign site, survey answers or September 16 debate appearance. The City lists an email address only.

Source City candidate list · Checked October 11

Chief operating officer of a contracting and railings firm that has built units for London Middlesex Community Housing. Grew up in Ward 4, holds a master's in economics and opened the London Wine Bar in 2015.

Lifelong Ward 4 resident. Says the run is for the people and wants residents to bring concerns by phone, text or email.

A 25-year Ward 4 homeowner and advocate for the working class. Ward 4 councillor for eight years, retired paralegal and founder of the Homeowners Homeless Program. Awarded the Medal of Meritorious Conduct for saving a life.

Registered massage therapist, self-employed in London for 12 years, born and raised in East London. Volunteers with Tourism London and set up a trust fund at H.B. Beal Secondary for low-income students' extracurriculars.

Semi-retired lawyer who spent most of a career as a mediator for the Ontario Labour Relations Board. Former two-term school board trustee; has lived in Ridgeview Heights for a decade.

Last time out
Previous municipal result, per the City's certified results.

Ran for Ward 4 council in 2022: 63 votes (1.68%).

Ran for Ward 9 council in 2022: finished second with 1,569 votes (22.75%) of five candidates.

Ran for Ward 4 council in 2022: finished fifth with 365 votes (9.72%) of seven candidates.

Ran for Ward 3 council in 2022: finished second with 1,026 votes (25.90%) of five candidates.

How they voted
Landmark council votes this term, for anyone who sat on council.
Reach them
Tap to copy.
Where they stand
Home­lessness
What would they do about homelessness?
—

Would welcome supportive housing even where neighbours object, while bringing residents and stakeholders together. Wants affordable and supportive housing for seniors, families and people experiencing homelessness, and better conditions for tenants.

Would prevent homelessness first with renoviction and demoviction bylaws and a tenant relocation program. Backs proven supportive housing such as Project Village SoHo and wants Ontario to fund it.

—

Wants a net 10 percent drop in homelessness by 2028 and 25 percent by term end, with City contracts judged on results. Would not add major City operating costs without senior-government funding.

Calls supportive housing necessary, worked out with community and developer. Says tax hikes push low earners to the street; wants social housing applicants to say why they came to London.

Piloted a garage unit at home for a Homeowners Homeless Program, where homeowners would house low-risk homeless people on welfare or ODSP for less than the current system costs. Would expand the Men's Mission and Salvation Army for the toughest cases.

Calls the unhoused crisis a top priority. Backs Community Land Trusts and rent-geared-to-income housing, clear data standards so non-profits can win steadier funding, and more provincial and federal money.

Would prevent renovictions, work with groups like Indwell, and look at the City building transitional and low-cost housing, since the market will not supply it. Wants homelessness spending tracked by outcomes.

Roads, traffic & transit
What would they do about roads, traffic and transit?
—

Wants better pedestrian, cycling and transit links, including a cyclists-only Thames bridge, and strongly agrees with 15-minute peak bus service. Says growth means maintaining roads, bridges and sidewalks while expanding transit.

Puts timely road repair, snow removal and street lights among top priorities, wants easy travel by road, transit, bike and sidewalk, and strongly agrees with 15-minute peak bus service.

—

Wants a Highbury-area traffic and connectivity study within 100 days, yearly signal-timing reviews and no overlapping work on parallel arterials. Would finish the rapid transit underway and add longer service hours.

Names improved public transit as one way to make London more accessible.

Wants current road construction finished and money spent on roads. Calls transit a provincial responsibility and would push Ontario to help.

Wants more buses for better frequency, an express airport bus from downtown, roadwork scheduled to cut congestion and bike lanes beside sidewalks. Would look at a capped bus pass like Toronto's.

Says London Transit needs focus next term, with reliable buses and riders able to know each route's frequency. Says most major roads should not be under construction at the same time.

Addiction & mental health
What would they do on addiction and mental health?
—

Wants more addiction treatment, mental health services and outreach, and community policing aimed at drug trafficking. Would move some police money to social workers and nurses.

Says one HART Hub is not enough and backs a range of programs, including harm reduction and House of Hope-style care for complex needs. Says health care is provincial, so Ontario should fund it.

—

Wants withdrawal management, treatment and mental-health care, with enforcement against open drug use and encampments that connects people to services. Says Ontario must fund treatment at the scale needed.

Backs ending safer supply, putting public safety first, and lists safe addiction centres as a City cost to cut, saying they belong to Ontario. Wants repeat offenders held at least a year or two.

Would ban open drug use and end free drug kits, then help people who are homeless into stable housing. Wants a downtown security force to respond to incidents and protect residents.

Wants social workers alongside police on mental-health calls. Says safer supply is ineffective without expanded treatment but works when paired with proper provincial and federal support.

Calls dealing with residents facing homelessness, mental health issues or addiction London's biggest challenge. Says it is mainly a provincial problem Ontario should pay for, but the City must meet basic needs first.

In their own words
London Decides questionnaire
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
Not sentNo email on file at time of sending out
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
Read 5 answersReceived September 5, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“The one thing I most want to change is to show Londoners that there can be a council that works with residents, takes their issues into consideration, fights for neighbourhoods and is constantly present. I want Londoners to believe their city government delivers good value for what they pay By 2030, residents should be able to see neighbourhood roads and sidewalks being repaired on time, cleaner and safer public spaces, quicker responses to property-standard complaints, and major projects reported publicly against their original budgets and timelines. They should also see property-tax increases brought under control instead of routinely exceeding household income growth. To achieve that, I would be willing to defer lower-priority capital projects, reduce spending on programs that cannot demonstrate results, and give up initiatives I personally like when essential neighbourhood services provide greater value. Council cannot promise everything while also claiming to protect affordability. Governing means choosing.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“In my current job as a Chief Operating Officer for a local company, my job is to manage people, including employees, trades, and customers. I had to bring owners, consultants, property managers and trades together when they disagreed about a project’s cost, scope and schedule, etc. I first had to move the discussion away from each party defending its own position. I asked everyone to identify the work required for safety and long-term performance, and then separate that from work that could be phased or changed. I found it helpful to create a vision where everyone is contributing to the project sequentially, working together for a common goal rather than taking an individualistic approach. These collaborative, decision-making situations have taught me a valuable experience that is very applicable to governing as a group: that getting a decision is not about winning every point. It is about understanding what others need, changing the proposal without abandoning its purpose, and giving people a practical reason to say yes.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“Residents have already asked me what I would do to fix the shortage of addiction treatment, psychiatric care and withdrawal-management beds. I tell them plainly that City Council does not control Ontario’s healthcare system or decide how many treatment beds London receives. Those decisions rest primarily with the provincial government and Ontario’s healthcare agencies. However, that cannot be an excuse to pass the problem along. I would press the province with specific requests supported by local data, work with London’s MPPs and healthcare providers, and seek a united council position rather than fifteen separate messages. I would also use the authority the City does have over housing, outreach, shelters, sanitation, bylaws and public spaces. A councillor must be honest about jurisdiction while still using every available relationship and public platform to move the decision.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“I want to be known for financial accountability and protecting the affordability of living in London while also ensuring that programs are properly funded to allow our city to thrive and ensure we are solving some of our most pressing issues. The tension is that keeping taxes under control cannot mean allowing roads, housing, emergency services and other essential infrastructure to deteriorate. The strongest argument against my position is that years of spending restraint can create an infrastructure deficit that ultimately costs taxpayers more. Inflation, population growth and provincial downloading also create real pressures that Council cannot simply wish away. That argument is valid. My position is not that every tax increase is irresponsible or that every program should be cut. It is that Council must establish priorities, measure results and prove that existing money is being used effectively before asking residents for more. I would support necessary investments when the evidence is clear, even when doing so is politically uncomfortable. Fiscal responsibility means spending deliberately, not refusing to spend.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“I created the “Feed the Front Line Workers” program through my business, the London Wine Bar during the pandemic. Londoners were very generous in supporting our take-out business while restaurants were closed. Instead of accepting tips for our food deliveries - as it was just my business partner and I doing the deliveries - we accepted donations and delivered thousands of free meals to hospital staff, the Men’s Mission, Ronald McDonald House, nursing homes and other organizations across the city. It was practical community work: identify a need, bring residents and businesses together, manage the resources responsibly and deliver something tangible. It reflects how I would approach council—by building partnerships and focusing on results people can actually see. The program and related media coverage are documented at www.mariojozic.ca (scroll down to Media Coverage for links and other news articles). Here is the direct link for that program: https://lfpress.com/news/local-news/community-members-feed-essential-workers-through-donations-to-restaurant https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/london-wine-bar-donations-to-feed-a-front-line-worker-1.5542117”
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
Read 5 answersReceived September 30, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“By the end of this term, I would want to make a meaningful impact on the unhoused crisis currently facing London. There would be two very tangible ways to show that I had accomplished this. First, there would be clearly defined language set out by the City to support non-profits with their data collection (ie. a framework that identifies what constitutes a meal vs a snack, etc.). This will help them secure more accurate data that will translate to provincial and federal funding, and show residents where exactly money is being spent. Second, contributing as a City in whatever way is feasible to the implementation of a Community Land Trust. This will allow these non-profits to maintain reasonable, potentially low, operating costs, through controlled and sustainably affordable rent on property they will be able to develop to properly service the needs of the community they serve. As a councillor, I would give up my free time and a portion of my annual salary to support this particular cause. I would collaborate and work alongside each of these organizations together, helping establish networking paths that can also sustain beyond however long my time as a councillor would be.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“There was a time when I was looking to expand my current professional practice and open up a clinic. At the time, it was incredibly hard to get funding for a variety of reasons: I was still quite young (mid-20's), I was self-employed which made providing proof of income harder, and the entire venture seemed too risky despite a very solid business plan. In the end, I had to give up my original clinic concept and pivot to a brick-and-mortar, pre-established location. What this new opportunity gave was clear proof of income that the space was already generating (it was an existing clinic takeover), which meant I no longer needed to ask for a small business loan or grant. This helped me get my bank on board, leading to success in the end.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“I've heard from quite a few people how badly we need a mental health facility to better support Londoners (both unhoused and housed). In these discussions I have kept my answer the same: this is something the provincial government ultimately decides and funds, and while this is unfortunate there are still a few things we can do at our local level to make positive impacts. Outside of showing up to vote for change at our next Provincial Election, we can expand a network of social workers alongside our current police force to better help individuals when emergency calls come in (again, both unhoused and housed). There is a large burden on our police forces (local and provincial) to handle calls they have very minimal or no training in, and providing this branch of support would show benefits for emergency workers as well as the individuals seeking help.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“I want to be most known for making London more affordable to live in. The biggest factor impacting this is the cost of living. By shifting focus to creating affordable housing and rental opportunities for low- and middle-income residents, we can better support all residents. We can work with for-profit developers using planning tools such as inclusionary zoning and density bonuses to incentivise support for more affordable rental projects through Community Land Trusts. We can also look into working with Generate Upcycle, a facility on Green Valley Road, that creates Renewable Natural Gas energy through composting that is already available on our energy grid. I feel torn on this issue because we do need to collect taxes to fund vital City programs and services such as public transit, parks, community centres, waste removal and wastewater handling, and emergency services. This leads to less affordable property taxes, and doesn't guarantee the taxes collected will be allocated to smoothly operate these vital services. The strongest argument against my position is tied to this; that taxes right now are not being distributed in meaningful ways that positively impact our day-to-day lives, despite the cost of living increasing at an astronomical rate. This can be corrected with a council that supports its residents with tangible differences; a council that works to make commutes, waste pickup, emergency services, and public spaces function for its residents in ways that ease the burden of the cost of living, while also putting energy towards initiatives that create affordable living opportunities and trimming the budget where possible.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“One thing I've already done in London is work with teachers and administration at H.B.Beal Secondary School to create a Trust Fund in honour of my father, that provides financial support for kids from low-income households who want to participate in extracurriculars. It's set up on my professional website for any prospective donors, and the goal is to grow it to encompass all sports, arts, etc., with the hope to expand it across schools in Thames Valley District. The link to view the story is here: https://www.randiprunnermt.ca/community”
No responseSent September 3
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
—
—
—
—
—
Climate Action London
Transit frequency, affordable-housing target, climate fund. Agree or disagree.climateactionlondon.ca→
—
—
—
—
Concerned Citizens (CCAL)
Budgets and taxes, council vs. staff, policing, safer supply. Fifteen questions.ccalondon.substack.com→
—
—
—
—
—
—
Council of Canadians
Ratings on twelve issues, then water, AI data centres, opioids and taxes. One report.londoncouncilofcanadians.ca→
—
—
—
—
—
—
London Cycle Link
Cycling and road safety, from a ride-along on their own streets.Ride-along report (PDF)→
—
—
—
—
London Free Press
Seven questions. One article per race; free account to read past the top.lfpress.com→
—
—
—
London Muslims Vote
Thirteen yes-or-no questions: Islamophobia plan, Palestine, community health, schools.londonmuslimsvote.ca→
—
—
—
—
—
Nature London
Parks vs. environmentally significant areas; development next to natural heritage.naturelondon.ca→
—
—
—
—
—
Pillar Nonprofit
The nonprofit sector: multi-year funding, a seat in City decisions.pillarnonprofit.ca→
—
—
—
—
—
—
TREA
The City's climate commitments and the environment. One page, by question.trea.ca→
—
—
—
—
—
—

No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →

What Ward 4 was wrestling with

The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.

■ CITY DECIDES

The northeast gets skipped for city money

When core-area money is handed out, this ward isn't on the list. The Core Area Action Plan formally covers Downtown, Richmond Row, Midtown, and Old East Village, not Huron Heights, so core-revitalization, safety, and homelessness budget lines flow to Old East Village (now in Ward 1) rather than the northeast. Old North East Neighbourhood Association co-founder Jacqueline Fraser has put the grievance directly: "Northeast London is often looked down upon by the decision-makers and influencers." There is also no BIA covering the Highbury Avenue commercial strip in the new ward.

Put them on the record

Which capital project in the northeast would you fight to get into the next budget?

■ CITY DECIDES

Violent crime is above where 2019 left it

London is paying more for policing than it ever has, and violent crime severity is still about 24% above 2019, with the citywide index rising in 2025 for the first time since 2021. The concern lands hardest in this ward's Highbury corridor and student-rental zones, where neighbourhood-level risk is cited as above city averages; residents felt it directly in the October 15, 2025 linked shootings on Huron Street and Homestead Crescent (a major-crime response, no injuries reported). Because no neighbourhood-level severity index is published, the ward-level picture rests on incidents rather than an official number — which is exactly why the ask below demands a measurable answer.

The honest numbers ▾

Statistics Canada's official measure puts London CMA's Crime Severity Index at 66.0 in 2025, up 8% from 2024 and its first rise since 2021, though still 12% below 2019 (national index: 75.0, down 5%). The rise came on both lines: violent crime severity (79.6 in 2025) is about 24% above 2019, while non-violent severity is still 23% below it. That is against a $672-million four-year police budget under which 69 officers were hired in 2024, 35 of them growth positions. No neighbourhood-level severity index is published. StatCan — Crime Severity Index by CMA, 2025 ↗

Put them on the record

What would you vote to fund for safety in the Highbury corridor, and what number would tell us it worked?

■ CITY DECIDES

Where the sidewalks still don't go

Which streets get sidewalks is still an open file. The Huron Heights Neighbourhood Connectivity Plan led to a November 2023 council decision approving most proposed sidewalk locations while exempting dozens of crescents and courts from the city's Mobility Policy 349. Building them carries into the new term.

The honest numbers ▾

Council approved 17 of 20 proposed sidewalk locations, exempted 24 crescents and 14 courts, and deferred four streets.

Put them on the record

Will you keep the Connectivity Plan sidewalks on schedule, and do the exempted streets stay exempt?

■ CITY DECIDES

The bike routes council cut

The ward lost planned bike routes last year. The Old North East Neighbourhood Association wrote a March 31, 2025 letter opposing the removal of Mobility Master Plan cycling additions on Huron, Taylor, McNay, and Gammage streets. Council split the difference on April 1, 2025: Huron survived as a medium-term cycling project, but the Taylor, McNay and Gammage routes were removed from the cycling network maps.

The honest numbers ▾

Per the April 1, 2025 council minutes: the motion to remove Huron Street from the cycling network failed 5–10, and Huron was instead moved to a medium-term cycling project (14–1); the Taylor, McNay and Gammage routes were removed 10–5 (opposed: Peloza, McAlister, Trosow, Franke, Ferreira). Council then approved the final Mobility Master Plan on July 22, 2025. council minutes, April 1, 2025 ↗

Put them on the record

Would you move to restore the cycling routes cut from Taylor, McNay and Gammage, and would you speed up Huron's?

■ CITY DECIDES

Student rentals are changing the neighbourhood

Post-war bungalows here keep converting to student rentals, driven by Fanshawe College next door, a housing-character and affordability issue distinct from the downtown/Old East Village housing debate.

Put them on the record

What specific rule or licensing change, if any, would you support for student rentals in this ward?

■ CITY DECIDES

Not enough trees, hotter streets

Old Northeast London sits well below the city's recommended tree canopy target, with the heat-island risk that comes with bare streets. The Old North East Neighbourhood Association's "Tree Canopy for All" initiative partnered with Reforest London, Nature Canada, and Nature London on a tree planting at Huron Heights Park in September 2025.

The honest numbers ▾

Roughly 30% of the city's recommended tree canopy target; the September 27, 2025 planting added 50–80 trees at Huron Heights Park.

Put them on the record

Name one funded step you'd take at council to close the northeast's tree-canopy gap, beyond volunteer plantings.

WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
  • August 8, 2026 region audit: “East London” removed as a listed neighbourhood (that district is 71% Ward 1) and “Huron Heights” qualified to its core — the district as a whole is 73% Ward 3, 27% Ward 4, and an October 28, 2026 overlay of the same layer on the 2022 and 2026 ward boundaries shows about a fifth of the district, on its west side, moving from Ward 3 to Ward 4; checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (scripts/check-ward-regions.mjs).
  • August 8, 2026: most of Stoneybrook (61% of the planning district) confirmed as Ward 4 territory when checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer (Open Data, Community MapServer layer 18) sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (the same Open Data file the site’s ward maps are built from); its western part is Ward 5. It was previously mislisted on the Ward 5 page. The region line now names it.
  • Ward 4 population (current or post-redraw) was not found; only 2011 Huron Heights neighbourhood-level figures were available, which pre-date current boundaries and are not presented as ward population.
  • RESOLVED July 4: The April 1, 2025 council minutes answer the cycling question. The motion to remove Huron Street failed 5–10 and Huron was moved to a medium-term cycling project (14–1), while the Taylor, McNay and Gammage routes were removed 10–5. The cycling issue card above now carries the minutes as its source.
  • A few honest-numbers items on this page (sidewalk gaps, tree canopy) don't yet link to a primary source; we're still tracking those down.
  • August 7, 2026: the safety issue card was reframed to lead with the StatCan trend (violent crime severity ~24% above 2019; first citywide index rise since 2021) rather than the October 2025 Huron Street shootings, which stay as the local example. A fresh search found no new ward safety developments; the only new material was unsourced aggregator blogs whose figures conflict with StatCan's official index, and none of it was used.
  • An August 2, 2026 re-check found no new Ward 4-relevant developments since the July 19 update. Specifically searched with no results: progress on the Huron Heights / Highbury sidewalk and tree-canopy files, any follow-up on the October 15, 2025 Huron Street shootings (no charges reported), any city response to the "northeast gets skipped for city money" grievance, and any mayoral-race coverage that touched Ward 4 substance. Nothing on this page changed as a result, and the open questions listed here still stand.