Skip to content
MENU

This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 8 today: your councillor and the record →

DECIDED · OCT 26, 2026

Ward 8, 2026

West-central London: Oakridge · Hyde Park corridor

1234567891011121314ALL RACES ↗

The result

CERTIFIED RESULTS · OCTOBER 28, 2026 · CITY OF LONDON

Ward 8 councillor
1 SEAT · 7,523 BALLOTS CAST
Ward 8 councillor results, ordered by votes
CANDIDATEVOTES
Steve LehmanELECTED5,005
Osam Ali1,207
Coralia Esterra Tudor1,175

The ward at a glance

Incumbent Steve Lehman, on council since 2018, is seeking a third term against two challengers. Nominations closed August 21, 2026; the City certified the list on August 24. Ward 8's lines likely carry over from the December 2024 approval; it wasn't among the late map amendments.

Two candidates carry a prior election record. London used Ranked Choice Voting for the 2018 election only; results since have used the standard one-vote system. Osam Ali ran for Ward 8 council in 2018, placing sixth of nine with 402 first-round votes under Ranked Choice Voting, per the City's official results. Steve Lehman, the incumbent, was elected Ward 8 councillor in 2022 with 3,669 votes (69.55%) of four candidates, per the City's certified results.

The rest of the field: Coralia Esterra Tudor.

Who ran

Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.

QUESTIONNAIRE1 of 3 in this ward have answered
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
Osam Ali
Steve LehmanIncumbent Ward 8 councillor
Coralia Esterra Tudor
Scroll sideways to compare all 3 candidates →
1 of 3
Who they are

Business intelligence specialist and college professor, with over 18 years in health care including Ontario Health. Has a Western software engineering PhD. Running on affordability, safer communities and better transportation.

Ward 8 councillor since 2018, seeking re-election. Came to London for Western; has over 35 years in business, including a small business. Running on public safety, affordability and traffic.

Philanthropist who donates time and money, with over 25 years of volunteering. Studied political science, education and paralegal work. Running on homelessness and downtown vacancies, affordable housing and jobs.

Last time out
Previous municipal result, per the City's certified results.

Ran for Ward 8 council in 2018: placed sixth of nine with 402 first-round votes under Ranked Choice Voting, per the City's official results.

Elected Ward 8 councillor in 2022: 3,669 votes (69.55%) of four candidates.

How they voted
Landmark council votes this term, for anyone who sat on council.
Reach them
Tap to copy.
Where they stand
Home­lessness
What would they do about homelessness?

Wants faster response to safety concerns, cleaner public space and stronger outreach. Would tackle root causes with more supportive housing, mental health care and addiction treatment, while protecting neighbourhood safety.

Sends social workers when residents call about safety, steering people to shelter, not park encampments. Would continue supportive housing partnerships like Indwell. Says the province runs health care and must provide rehab centres.

Wants two shelters, one indoor camp-style site with services for people not ready for treatment, one for rehabilitation, treatment and job skills. Would audit current services and merge agencies.

Source Campaign site · Chamber survey · Ward 8 debate, Sept 23
Roads, traffic & transit
What would they do about roads, traffic and transit?

Wants more frequent transit to job areas, better service for shift workers, and frequency and reliability targets, working with employers on routes. Also better traffic flow and clearer construction planning.

Wants crews working until 11 pm and Saturdays on major roads away from homes, shortening closures. Says industry believes efficiencies would offset extra costs. Wants better transit to industrial areas.

Wants roads built once for future capacity and lights timed for flow. Would add bus pullouts, shift-end bus routes to hubs, and bike lanes when major roads are rebuilt.

Source Chamber survey · Campaign site
Addiction & mental health
What would they do on addiction and mental health?

Wants support services to usually lead on public drug use, with police for safety concerns, violence, trafficking or refusal to comply. Backs police power to make public drug users leave.

Says mental health and addiction are behind downtown problems; the province must restore mental health and rehab centres. Wants laws changed so police can prevent harm to self or others.

Would press Ontario for a mental health and addictions rehab centre for unhoused people. Opposes safe supply, saying it feeds addiction instead of helping people. Wants dealers arrested, open drug use stopped.

Source London Decides questionnaire · Campaign site · Chamber survey
In their own words
London Decides questionnaire
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
Read 5 answersReceived September 13, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾

What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.

“I would like to tackle Affordable Housing, and I would be willing to give up expanding roads, expanding public transit, and my popularity to get it. Housing is not a privilege, but a right. I am not suggesting that it needs to be luxury, but a basic apartment that can be paid for by a single person working minimum wage, on disability (ODSP) or welfare (OW). Rent should be low enough to allow someone to not only pay the rent, but afford food and a bus pass. To achieve this I want to work with builders to convert shopping plazas into a mixed use building with retailers, businesses and housing all in one place.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾

A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?

“For years I believed that our school would need a new playground and I wanted to be proactive. I began advocating for it in 2017, by 2022 I pushed the matter to the forefront of the agenda, by breaking the project from school council to it's own project I was able to get them around to my side. I then chaired that committee as well, held meetings with vendors, and began the process of getting board approval. By 2023, the board came around and removed the old playground in the summer. That October, the new playground was approved. I then helped organize fundraisers, and even ran a match campain donating over $7500 towards the cost. What I gave up was being chair of school council, so that I could focus on what was needed most. I got pushed aside and got little credit, but every day I see the kindergarten kids playing I know I made the right choice.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾

Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.

“Creating a mental health facility to help address the needs of the unhoused is one of the biggest asks that is outside of municipal jurisdiction. The health portfolio belongs to the province. I strongly believe that this should be addressed, and am willing to push the province on this and work with the rest of council, local landowners and developers to create the facility. We can build a mental health and addictions rehabilitation center and partner with Western University and Fanshawe's medical and nursing programs to staff it.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾

Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?

“I want to be know for an innovative affordable housing plan for the city. Where I feel torn is that getting others on board may mean becoming disliked and unpopular. The biggest argument against affordable housing is you don't control the market. We will need to freeze the cost of affordable homes and implement penalties for those who attempt to resell them at a higher value.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾

Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.

“I have never been in the paper or recived huge accolades for my work, but have spent more that 25 years volunteering for my community. South West/Oakridge Soccer club as a soccer coach, I am a Docent at Museum London working with school groups to educate them on Art and local history, I held a similar role at the museum of Ontario Archeology, I was a Scout Canada leader, I have sat on the school council at John Dearness for 9 years and counting, I am a board member of my local synagogue I am a board member at CSCN (Community Services Coordation Network. I hand out bags at local foodbank drives and help sort food I have made food for the family shelter. Organized movies in the park Tree planting Provided onsite first-aid for charity events I have donated to many causes in our city and surrounding communities from shelters, to playgrounds, to libraries.”
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
Climate Action London
Transit frequency, affordable-housing target, climate fund. Agree or disagree.climateactionlondon.ca→
—
—
Concerned Citizens (CCAL)
Budgets and taxes, council vs. staff, policing, safer supply. Fifteen questions.ccalondon.substack.com→
—
—
Council of Canadians
Ratings on twelve issues, then water, AI data centres, opioids and taxes. One report.londoncouncilofcanadians.ca→
—
—
London Cycle Link
Cycling and road safety, from a ride-along on their own streets.Ride-along report (PDF)→
—
London Free Press
Seven questions. One article per race; free account to read past the top.lfpress.com→
Nature London
Parks vs. environmentally significant areas; development next to natural heritage.naturelondon.ca→
—
—
Pillar Nonprofit
The nonprofit sector: multi-year funding, a seat in City decisions.pillarnonprofit.ca→
—
TREA
The City's climate commitments and the environment. One page, by question.trea.ca→
—
—

No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →

What Ward 8 was wrestling with

The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.

■ CITY DECIDES

Growth is reshaping Oakridge and Hyde Park

Oakridge and the Hyde Park area sit inside the fast-growing part of the city that drove the citywide ward boundary review; the City has cited high growth in the north and west as a driver of the 2026 boundary shifts. The City also runs an "Oakridge Decides" participatory-budgeting page for the neighbourhood.

Put them on the record

As the west end grows, name one thing in Oakridge or Hyde Park you'd fight to keep exactly as it is.

■ CITY DECIDES

Property taxes vs. community grants

To hold down the tax impact of the 2024-27 Multi-Year Budget, Lehman and Deputy Mayor Lewis proposed in 2024 to cancel funding for the City's Capital and Innovation Grants and Neighbourhood Decision Making program for 2025-2027; the nonprofit sector, via Pillar Nonprofit Network, publicly opposed the cut. The outcome is now confirmed from the City's own records, and it was a reduction rather than the proposed cancellation: the annual grants pool fell from $496,000 in 2024 to $250,000 in 2025, with the Grassroots, Innovation and Capital streams all still funded in 2025. For 2026 the City again made $250,000 available but restricted it to Capital projects only, with a $50,000 cap per grant, so the Innovation and Grassroots streams were not offered this year. The 2026 recipients had not been published as of August 2, 2026.

The honest numbers ▾

2024 allocations totalled $496,000: Grassroots $100,000 + Innovation $239,890 + Capital $156,110. 2025 allocations totalled $250,000: Grassroots $115,780 + Innovation $96,330 + Capital $37,890. For 2026 the City announced $250,000 available for Capital projects only, capped at $50,000 per grant. The 2024 and 2025 figures are sums of the individual awards the City lists; the 2026 figure is the amount the City announced as available, not an allocation total. City of London Community Grants Program ↗

Put them on the record

When taxes and community grants collide in the budget, which gives, and where specifically?

■ CITY DECIDES

Empty buildings and rundown properties

The City has an active Vacant Buildings By-law (A-35) and Property Standards By-law (CP-24), and local media have covered derelict-building demolition cases citywide, including a September 2023 property-standards order at 1154 Hamilton Road. No Ward 8-specific enforcement dispute was confirmed in this research pass.

Put them on the record

Would you fund tougher enforcement of the vacant-buildings and property-standards bylaws, and with what money?

■ CITY DECIDES

How development gets reviewed

In 2023, council voted to dissolve the volunteer Urban Design Peer Review Panel after a motion co-sponsored by Ward 8's Steve Lehman and Deputy Mayor Shawn Lewis, who argued it was redundant and added time and cost to development approvals. Some of its urban-design role moved to the Advisory Committee on Planning. The change affects how new buildings get reviewed in every ward, including this one.

The honest numbers ▾

Council voted 10-4 to dissolve the panel (Hopkins, Ferreira, Franke, and Trosow voted to keep it; Hillier was absent). CBC News ↗

Put them on the record

Was dissolving the Urban Design Peer Review Panel the right call, and what, if anything, should replace it?

□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE

The big three: homelessness, safety, roads

A CBC reader survey found homelessness, open drug use, and roads topping citywide concerns heading into the 2026 election. They are plausible doorstep issues in Ward 8 too, though no Ward 8-specific polling or reporting confirmed them as active local flashpoints.

The honest numbers ▾

The survey drew 330+ respondents and was non-scientific; results were citywide, not broken out for Ward 8. CBC News ↗

Put them on the record

Which of homelessness, drug use, or roads do you hear most at Ward 8 doors, and what would you actually vote for on it?

WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
  • New Ward 8 boundary detail could not be extracted from an authoritative primary source in this pass; verify against the City's interactive ArcGIS ward map or the Ward Boundary Review final report before relying on the Oakridge/Hyde Park-corridor description.
  • No population figure (old or new) was located for Ward 8.
  • The inference that Ward 8's boundary comes from the December 2024 Final Option 1 approval (because Ward 8 is not named among the later amendments to Wards 1, 4, 11, and 13) is unconfirmed against the City's official record.
  • RESOLVED August 2, 2026: the Community Grants outcome is confirmed from the City's own allocation records (london.ca/living-london/community-services/city-london-community-grants-program) and its February 11, 2026 newsroom release (london.ca/newsroom/city-london-now-accepting-applications-capital-grants), which is the source for the 2026 $250,000 and $50,000-cap figures. It was a partial reduction, not the full cancellation the 2024 motion proposed. Awards totalled $496,000 in 2024 (Grassroots $100,000 + Innovation $239,890 + Capital $156,110) and $250,000 in 2025 (Grassroots $115,780 + Innovation $96,330 + Capital $37,890), so all three streams survived 2025 at roughly half the money. For 2026 the City announced $250,000 for Capital projects only, capped at $50,000 per grant, meaning Innovation and Grassroots were not offered this year. Note the halving took effect in 2025, not 2026; 2026 held the reduced level and narrowed eligibility.
  • Still open on grants: the fate of the Neighbourhood Decision Making program, which the 2024 motion also targeted, was not confirmed in this pass and is tracked separately from the Community Grants streams. The 2026 recipients had not been published as of August 2, 2026 (the City's page said allocations would be announced shortly). Whether the 2026 Capital-only restriction is a one-year budget decision or runs through 2027 was also not confirmed against the multi-year budget document.
  • CBC.ca articles returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch in the July 2 pass; on July 3, 2026 both CBC articles cited on this page were fetched in full and the quoted claims (10-4 vote to dissolve the Urban Design Peer Review Panel, with Hopkins, Ferreira, Franke, and Trosow voting to keep it and Hillier absent; 330+-response non-scientific survey) were verified against the article text.
  • A conflicting Ward 8 neighbourhood description ("the Oakridge Park and Oakridge Acres neighbourhoods in northwest London") has circulated and does not match this page's "West-central London: Oakridge · Hyde Park corridor" description. Since the ward's boundary is already flagged as unverified below, treat both descriptions as unconfirmed until checked against the City's official ward map.
  • Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the list on August 24.
  • CORRECTED August 27, 2026: the campaign phone number 226-234-9506, recorded from votesteve.ca on August 2, was removed at the request of the Lehman campaign (via corrections@londondecides.ca), which said the site had listed it in error. Verified before removal: votesteve.ca no longer shows any campaign phone number. The council office line (519-661-2489) remains.