This page is kept as it stood on election day, October 26, 2026, with the results added on top. Nothing on it has changed since, apart from corrections, which are listed on the updates page. Ward 9 today: your councillor and the record →
DECIDED · OCT 26, 2026
Ward 9, 2026
Southwest London: Byron · Lambeth · Talbot Village · River Bend
Incumbent Anna Hopkins, on council since 2014, is seeking a fourth term against five challengers, none of whom has previously held elected office. Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the candidate list on August 24. The race is about growth in the city's fastest-growing quadrant: how much, how dense, and whether roads, schools, and sewers can keep up. That question got a concrete answer on June 23, 2026, when council approved buildings up to six storeys on Colonel Talbot Road in Lambeth. The boundary redraw appears to leave the ward's footprint largely intact, with all of Lambeth staying inside it.
Three candidates carry a prior election record. Anna Hopkins, the incumbent, was elected Ward 9 councillor in 2022 with 4,281 votes (62.07%) of five candidates, per the City's certified results. London used Ranked Choice Voting for the 2018 election only; results since have used the standard one-vote system. Matt Millar ran for Ward 9 council in 2018, finishing second to Anna Hopkins with 2,355 first-round votes (25.00%) under Ranked Choice Voting, per the City's official results. Veronica Warner ran for Ward 9 council in 2022, receiving 323 votes (4.7%), per the City's certified results.
The rest of the field, in alphabetical order: Tammy Abi-Khalil, Dino Jose, and Luke Thomas.
Who ran
Listed alphabetically, as on the ballot. Every card is as it stood on October 26.
QUESTIONNAIRE2 of 6 in this ward have answered
Narrow it downTap a name to hide or show them.
TATammy Abi-Khalil
AHAnna HopkinsIncumbent Ward 9 councillor
DJDino Jose
MMMatt Millar
LTLuke Thomas
VWVeronica Warner
Scroll sideways to compare all 6 candidates →
1 of 6
Who they are
Advocate for families and seniors who has supported people with Alzheimer's and helped residents navigate government in a constituency office. Running on a less divisive City Hall, transportation and safety.
Ward 9 councillor since 2014, seeking re-election. Londoner since 1985; served on Urban League and Lambeth and Byron community boards. Running on balanced growth, better mobility and holding taxes down.
Registered social worker and community leader with a master's in social work and years of experience serving families. Running on taxpayers first, safe neighbourhoods, smarter transportation and stronger communities.
Third-generation farmer, IT specialist and software developer who started a technology business. Running on careful spending, traffic flow and a leaner City Hall.
Founder of Healthy Eats, a London meal-prep company using local ingredients, and a volunteer youth football coach. Running on keeping property taxes low, protecting neighbourhood character and restoring public safety.
Fourth-generation Londoner who has owned a Byron salon for 30 years, with a service for hair loss. Running on homelessness, traffic and infrastructure.
Previous municipal result, per the City's certified results.
Elected Ward 9 councillor in 2022: 4,281 votes (62.07%) of five candidates.
Ran for Ward 9 council in 2018: finished second to Anna Hopkins with 2,355 first-round votes (25.00%) under Ranked Choice Voting, per the City's official results.
Ran for Ward 9 council in 2022: 323 votes (4.7%).
How they voted
Landmark council votes this term, for anyone who sat on council.
Wants outreach, treatment, recovery and housing linked, since housing alone is not treatment. Would support proposals meeting published safety, operating and accountability standards, and vote against those that do not.
Would keep updating the Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response, which takes money, time and collaboration. Wants varied housing citywide, and the province paying to run affordable units.
Wants more shelters and outreach services. Says homeless people can be rehabilitated through nonprofits, and wants the City to give nonprofits more roles, including housing, mental health and justice.
Wants published quarterly targets for shelter exits and housing placements, with funding tied to results. Supportive housing needs health supports and security, and must stay drug-free for residents and neighbours.
Wants City focus on prevention, supportive housing and paths into permanent housing. On new projects, would hear residents on location, design, safety and management. Wants homelessness reduced, not moved around.
Wants warming centres opening at minus 10 C and minus 15 C wind chill, and would move a motion if needed. Wants affordable housing citywide, not all in one area.
What would they do about roads, traffic and transit?
Wants the worst bottlenecks fixed and construction coordinated, with growth paying for roads. Would pilot smaller on-demand vehicles in southwest London, which could replace lower-demand routes if evidence supports it.
Wants existing roads upgraded and rapid transit extended north and west, since more homes mean more traffic. Says growth no longer pays its own way, so London needs provincial help.
Wants Commissioners Road West and Southdale Road West widened for traffic and growth, developers paying for traffic studies before major approvals, and more frequent transit from the southwest to campuses.
Wants main roads moving, a ring road studied and BRT, now underway, finished without more overruns or lost road capacity. Backs more frequent buses where riders are and taxes allow.
Says no to BRT to keep taxes low. Wants infrastructure built before high-density projects, growth paying its fair share, and more frequent transit to jobs, including for shift workers.
What would they do on addiction and mental health?
Opposes open drug use and unobserved safer supply, which leave no path out. Wants lawful enforcement where public spaces turn unsafe, and other governments pressed for treatment and mental-health care.
Wants provincial funding for mental health and addictions supports; failing that, a new funding formula, since the current one is not sustainable. Says municipalities cannot do it alone.
Wants public drug use addressed through appropriate enforcement, outreach and coordination with health and social service partners. Supports prevention education so young people understand the risks of substance use.
Wants public drug use enforced, encampments cleared and help offered to anyone who wants it. Would push Board of Health dollars toward recovery and treatment, not managing continued use.
Wants strict by-law enforcement and the addiction crisis solved, not enabled. Says mental health and addiction treatment is mainly provincial, so the City should push for treatment and crisis response.
Wants loitering enforced, with foot patrols and 24-hour surveillance, since people feel unsafe downtown. Points to Vancouver's Salvation Army rebuild, with recovery programs, housing and job skills, as an example.
Same five questions to every candidate.How it works→
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 7, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“Full costing, before every vote, every time. Right now, city staff can approve contracts up to six million dollars without a single council vote, and council never even sees a report on anything under $133,800. Below that line, taxpayer money moves and the people elected to watch it don't find out unless someone files a freedom-of-information request, and even then the documents can come back redacted. By 2030, any Londoner should be able to open any city spending item and see the real cost before the money moves. Getting there means making enemies of whoever likes it this way: staff who'd rather not itemize, and any mayor who'd rather manage the message than open the books. I'm fine being the one who keeps asking the question nobody in that room wants asked.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“I'm developing a social sports network and league/team management service. Getting anyone to actually switch from what they already use is a fight, even for free. Nobody wants to learn a new system on someone else's word that it's better. I stopped asking people to try it and started removing every reason to say no. I am helping administer a volleyball league and giving them free access. I helped a friend put his softball team on it the same way: I did the setup, waived their fees, and provide ongoing support. What I gave up was money the software could have earned, and hours of my own time. People don't get talked into change. They get walked into it, by someone willing to carry the load until it's proven.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“A parent came to me about school bus routes: a stop removed, kids walking a kilometre, and not being able to get a bus home after practice. I told them plainly: a city councillor has no say in that. Day-to-day routing is Southwestern Ontario Student Transportation Services, TVDSB's bus operator. Policy sits with TVDSB's own transportation office. Our elected trustee is Beth Mai, covering wards 7, 8, 9, 10, and 13, though TVDSB has been under a provincially appointed supervisor since last year, so trustees aren't currently voting on board policy the way they normally would. What I can do anyway: point residents straight to TVDSB's transportation office, and copy Beth Mai on it, since trustees still hear from residents and can push things along without a formal vote. I offered to make the introduction myself if needed.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“Fiscal responsibility. No wasteful spending, full transparency on every dollar, and no tax hikes. What tears at me is saying no. A resident brings me something worth doing, and the math says the city can't afford it without raising taxes, and I still have to say no.
Here's the case against me. Refusing new revenue can mean deferring maintenance, and deferred infrastructure gets more expensive the longer a city waits. The same taxpayers pay for it eventually, just later, and for a bigger repair bill.
Prioritization is the fix. The full costing that I will be pushing for shows council the real cost of everything, so failing roads and pipes get funded first, and elective extras get delayed or cut.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“Before I ran, I read the City's own Official Plan and used it. In June 2025, a developer proposed 31 townhouses on Lambeth's old McEachren school site, all its traffic routed through Marianna Drive's single access point, while Lambeth's one remaining public school is already capped and busing new kids out of the village. I wrote directly to Councillor Hopkins asking her to oppose the whole project, then sent a full written case at https://millartime.substack.com/p/the-proposed-4402-colonel-talbot, built on the Plan's own commitments to safe, healthy neighbourhoods and real community engagement. She acknowledged the first email and never answered the second. She voted yes four and a half months later.
That's how I'd do the job: research, offer solutions, represent the will of Ward 9, and hold anyone to account who isn't doing what's best for residents.”
No responseSent September 3
▶Read 5 answersReceived September 8, 2026
Q1 — The one thingFull question ▾Hide ▴
What is the one thing you most want to have changed in London by the end of this term? Tell us what a resident would be able to see in 2030 that shows you did it, and what you would be willing to give up to get it.
“If I had to pick one thing I would like to see change. It would be more bylaw enforcement. Living in London and experiencing bylaws being broken and no enforcement is something that my community would like to see change. If we set rules by laws, It's really no use if there are no bylaw enforcement officers that come when complaints come in. Currently there are over 70 active bylaws. Residents of Ward 9 would like to see bylaw officers in Springbank Park. If we create bylaws we must be able to enforce them.”
Q2 — Getting it throughFull question ▾Hide ▴
A councillor is one vote of fifteen, and staff write the reports council votes on. Tell us about a time, in any part of your life, when you needed a decision from people who mostly disagreed with you and got it. Who did you have to bring around, what did you change in your ask, and what did you give up?
“20 years ago I made a decision to sell my house and move to BC. Many friends and family advised me to stay in London. The real estate agent argued about listing price and I took a loss. My family purchased a home for me in BC and I moved everything. The DO file flat the buyer turned out to be a fraud and in the end I lost thousands of dollars. As a result, I came back to London moved my things picked up where I left off with my business. It took a community to get me back on my feet. I will never forget the angels that believed in me and helped me pull it back together. It was a humbling experience that has kept me grounded and grateful. I gave up my grandiose thinking and started asking for help.”
Q3 — What council can't decideFull question ▾Hide ▴
Name one thing the people you'd represent will ask you for that city council cannot actually decide. Say plainly what you would tell them, who does hold that decision, and what you would do to move it anyway.
“One thing people will ask that Council cannot decide is, anything that has to do with our London police. I would tell them that the police are an independent operation that does not take direction from Council. In this case there would be no motion.”
Q4 — Where you're tornFull question ▾Hide ▴
Pick the issue you most want to be known for. Where do you feel torn on it, and what is the strongest argument against your own position?
“The issue we face as a city is the sad reality of drug addiction on our streets. I have watched how Vancouver fundraised enough money through gala's and auctions etc to raise money for "Nine stories of Hope" at the Salvation Army's harbor light facility. They rebuilt a larger facility with substance use recovery programs, Access to affordable housing and building employment skills.
Money was raised from the federal government, the affordable housing fund and money from correctional Canada, the province of BC and community housing incentive program (CHIP) as well as a land donation.
But I feel torn about picking this issue is that some people view the Salvation Army only as a religious organization. Although it is a Christian base, it has always been a staple of a place to go for people in need. The strongest element is the religious element. My argument is they have always held out a helping hand to those suffering and hold no discrimination towards anyone. They continue to be our largest and longest thriving service for addiction, mental illness and homelessness. The Salvation Army has been in London since July 17th. 1882.”
Q5 — The receiptFull question ▾Hide ▴
Point us to one thing you have already done for people in London, before this campaign, that a reader could check and that shows how you would do this job. A web address is welcome.
“The one thing I can tell you I do for people in the community is provide a business that provides a service for all forms of hair loss, e.g. chemotherapy and other medical conditions.
veronicashairshoppe.com”
Chamber of Commerce
Economy, the Downtown Plan, housing and taxes. Twelve questions.londonchamber.com→
No endorsements · Same rules for every candidate · Sources linked · London Decides questionnaire answers published word for word · How this is researched →
What Ward 9 was wrestling with
The issue cards as they stood during the campaign. The current versions are in the issue files, linked from the ward page.
■ CITY DECIDES
Colonel Talbot Road upgrade wrapping up mid-campaign
The Colonel Talbot rebuild is finishing right in the middle of the campaign, so lingering deficiencies or delays are a live local issue. The city has been converting the two-lane rural road with ditches and gravel shoulders into a two-lane urban complete street connecting Talbot Village and Lambeth, with new sidewalks, multi-use pathways, and boulevard bike paths.
After Colonel Talbot Road wraps up in summer 2026, which corridor should be next?
■ CITY DECIDES
The big Lambeth application was approved, not left pending
The ward's most-watched development file is decided. On June 23, 2026 Municipal Council approved the Official Plan amendment and rezoning for 3924, 4012 and 4050 Colonel Talbot Road, applied for by the City of London and Auburn Developments Inc. (the Heathwoods lands in Lambeth). The adopted site-specific policy permits single detached dwellings, stacked townhouses and apartment buildings on portions of the lands, to a maximum height of six storeys and a maximum density of up to 100 units per hectare, and allows garage and driveway widths up to 60% on lots with frontage of 12.0 metres or less. Council also supported red-line revisions to the Heathwoods draft plan of subdivision. The approved motion opened "Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development", so council departed from the staff recommendation; the staff report itself was not read in this research, so what staff recommended is not established here.
The honest numbers ▾
Approved June 23, 2026, with the by-laws enacted the same day: C.P.-1512(eb)-189 (Official Plan amendment) and Z.-1-263447 (rezoning). The committee report carrying the item passed 14 to 0 (one member absent); the item itself is recorded as "Motion Passed" with no recorded division; third reading and enactment of the bills passed 11 to 0 (four members absent). City of London – Municipal Council minutes, June 23, 2026 (item 2, 3.1) ↗
Put them on the record
Council has approved six-storey buildings on Colonel Talbot Road. What has to be built alongside them before people move in, and who pays for it?
■ CITY DECIDES
How fast should the southwest grow?
Lambeth, Talbot Village, and the surrounding southwest are the centre of London's fastest-growing quadrant; one planning summary describes the area as "all about development in the next 10 to 15 years." The rulebook is the Southwest Area Secondary Plan, which the city has been reviewing to decide whether to update it or fold it directly into The London Plan. That review has now produced a recommendation to fold it in, which went to council in July 2026 (see the next file).
The honest numbers ▾
The Southwest Area Secondary Plan was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in 2014 and is divided into 13 neighbourhoods, including the Bostwick and North Lambeth residential neighbourhoods. Get Involved London – SWAP Detailed Review ↗
Put them on the record
Should the Southwest Area Secondary Plan be updated on its own or folded into The London Plan?
■ CITY DECIDES
SWAP's future went to council July 21; the outcome wasn't published as of August 2
The recommendation now in front of council is to amend The London Plan to remove the Southwest Area Secondary Plan as a standalone secondary plan, carry specific SWAP policies into The London Plan for continued implementation, and make several land-use redesignations; a committee amendment also added 443 and 447 Exeter Road (Light Industrial to Shopping Area, with transition provisions). It reached the July 21, 2026 Municipal Council agenda as item 9 (3.3), tied to Bill No. 271 (Official Plan amendment) and Bill No. 286 (zoning, with holding provisions). As of August 2, 2026 the July 21 minutes are not posted, only the revised agenda, and there has been no council meeting since, so the outcome cannot be confirmed here. We are not stating that council passed it, and the absence of a posted notice is not evidence that it failed.
The honest numbers ▾
Planning and Environment Committee recommended it 5 to 0 on July 14, 2026 (item 3.3, SWAP Detailed Review, OZ-25029); the Exeter Road amendment also carried 5 to 0. What council did with it on July 21 is not yet confirmable from published minutes. City of London – Planning and Environment Committee minutes, July 14, 2026 ↗
Put them on the record
If the Southwest Area Secondary Plan is folded into The London Plan, which of its rules would you insist survive the move?
■ CITY DECIDES
Lambeth's sewage plant can't keep up
How much new housing Lambeth can take is partly a plumbing question. The local sewage plant (the Southland Water Treatment Plant, London's smallest, built in 2003 and developer-owned to service the Talbot Village subdivision) runs well below its rated capacity because it is highly susceptible to wet-weather flows and sediment loading. That gap limits how much new Lambeth-area housing can be serviced without further infrastructure investment.
What sewer and servicing investment would you require before approving more Lambeth-area housing?
□ SHARED: CITY + PROVINCE
The big three: homelessness, safety, roads
Homelessness, drugs, and roads topped voter concerns citywide in London polling ahead of the 2026 election. Ward 9's version of "roads" is the Colonel Talbot and Southdale construction, and affordability here plays out through new-subdivision servicing and pace-of-development questions rather than downtown-style disputes.
The honest numbers ▾
A CBC London reader survey ahead of the 2026 election ranked homelessness, drugs, and roads as top voter concerns citywide. CBC News – top election issues survey ↗
Put them on the record
On homelessness, drugs, or roads, name one thing you'd vote for that would actually reach Ward 9.
WHAT WE COULDN’T CONFIRM ▾
August 8, 2026 region audit: “Bostwick” removed — the Bostwick planning district is 100% Ward 10 (checked with the City’s Planning Districts layer sampled against the official 2026 ward polygons (scripts/check-ward-regions.mjs)).
The City's friendly planning pages lag its minutes. The planning-application page for 3924, 4012 and 4050 Colonel Talbot Road still reads "Council Resolution – not available at this time", but that page's last-modified date is June 11, 2026, twelve days before council actually approved the application. It is an un-refreshed page, not evidence of an undecided file. Treat the eScribe minutes as authoritative and check them before describing any application as pending.
What staff recommended on the Colonel Talbot application is not established. The approved motion opened "Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development", which means council departed from the staff recommendation, but the staff report was not read in this research. Do not characterize the staff position (in particular, do not say staff recommended refusal) without reading the report.
SWAP's council outcome is unconfirmed. Planning and Environment Committee recommended it 5 to 0 on July 14, 2026 and it reached the July 21, 2026 council agenda (Bill No. 271, Bill No. 286), but as of August 2, 2026 the July 21 minutes are not posted and there is no council meeting between July 21 and August 2 (summer recess). Follow-up: watch eScribe for the July 21 minutes, or an August public-notices Notice of Adoption. Trap to avoid: eScribe silently returns the revised AGENDA when minutes for July 21 are requested, and that agenda carries unassigned by-law placeholders, so a proposed by-law reads like a passed one. Also note the Colonel Talbot by-laws were independently confirmed as enacted and still have no notice posted, so a missing notice is not evidence of non-passage.
Precise new Ward 9 boundary not confirmed. The official map PDF exceeded research fetch limits; indirect evidence indicates the footprint carries forward largely intact. Verify against the City's interactive ward map before relying on boundary details.
Ward 9 population (current or post-redraw) was not found in this research pass.
Nominations closed August 21, 2026, and the City certified the list on August 24.